用基于证据的干预措施保护紧急响应人员 (PEREI):为职业生涯早期的紧急响应人员,重要其他人和监督人员进行随机对照试验的协议
Reginald D V Nixon1, Marja Elizabeth1, Daniel B Fassnacht1,2
1College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.
European journal of psychotraumatology
|November 12, 2024
概括
这项研究测试了以证据为基础的干预措施 (PEREI) 保护紧急响应者计划,以减少紧急服务人员的PTSD和抑郁症等心理健康问题. 结果将显示PEREI是否对高风险职业有效和经济高效.
科学领域:
- 心理健康研究 心理健康研究
- 职业健康 职业健康 职业健康
- 干预科学 干预科学
背景情况:
- 紧急服务人员面临高度的创伤和压力,增加PTSD,抑郁,焦虑和物质使用的风险.
- 针对这些人的现有心理健康计划已经显示出有限的有效性或仍然未经测试.
- PEREI倡议旨在通过以证据为基础的干预措施来弥补这一差距.
研究的目的:
- 为了测试三个PEREI程序的有效性:iCT-R,PEREI-S和BW-SO.
- 评估这些干预措施对PTSD和抑郁症严重程度的影响.
- 了解PEREI计划的调解员,主持人和成本效益.
主要方法:
- 招聘450名职业生涯早期的急救人员和180名监督人员,以及他们的支持人员.
- 随机分配到PEREI计划或标准心理健康护理.
- 项目前后评估,并进行6个月和12个月的后续评估.
主要成果:
- 主要结局包括PTSD和抑郁症的严重程度和可能的诊断.
- 二次措施评估调解员,调解员和成本效益.
- 数据收集正在进行中,结果正在等待.
结论:
- 该研究将提供关于有效方法的证据,以减少高风险职业中的心理健康风险.
- 这些发现将有助于更好地理解干预机制.
- 将确定PEREI计划的成本效益.
相关概念视频
Hazard Ratio
91
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
For example, in a clinical trial...
91
Randomized Experiments
6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
The Scientific Method
59.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.3K
Blinding
2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
121
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
121


