接触价值和群体突出如何影响异步计算机介导接触中的外群态度? 通过社交媒体帖子进行集团间接触的实验
Sramana Majumdar1, Vedika Puri1, Saransh Ahuja1
1Ashoka University.
The Journal of social psychology
|November 13, 2024
概括
通过社交媒体在线接触可以减少偏见,但它的有效性取决于联系质量和历史,而不仅仅是价值. 在线接触的负面影响比预期的要少.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 沟通研究 沟通研究
- 集团间关系 集团间关系
背景情况:
- 通过面对面的集团间接触,确立了减少损害的潜力.
- 对计算机介导的群体间联系 (在线联系) 的理解有限,特别是在社交媒体上.
- 研究主要集中在积极的,受控的在线接触上,忽视了负面的接触效应.
研究的目的:
- 检查在线接触价值 (正面,负面,中性) 对减少偏见的影响.
- 调查异步,控制较少的社交媒体互动的作用.
- 通过比较一个虚构的场景和一个真实的跨群体背景 (南方与北印度人) 的研究结果.
主要方法:
- 进行了三项实验性研究.
- 研究一:想象中的情景 (N=120).
- 研究2和3:与南印度人和北印度人的真实跨群体场景 (N=296,N=336).
- 分析包括单向ANOVA,因子ANOVA和多重调解分析.
主要成果:
- 接触价值在研究1和研究2中显著影响了外部群的态度.
- 在研究3中,复制失败;过去的接触质量/数量和状态差异是关键预测因素.
- 跨组焦虑和联系质量介导的态度变化,超过了价值效应.
- 区域认同和接触史是比价值更强的预测因素.
结论:
- 社交媒体上的异步调解联系对减少偏见有潜力但有局限性.
- 联系的质量,数量,群体间的焦虑,区域认同和历史背景显著影响了结果.
- 未来的研究应该考虑这些细微的因素,而不仅仅是在线互动中的简单价值.
更多相关视频
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
640
相关概念视频
In- and Out-Groups
38.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.9K
Surveys
14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
Group Polarization
34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
Stereotype Content Model
14.0K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.0K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.0K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.0K
Conformity
45.0K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.0K
