Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

328
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
328

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Prognostic Impact of Tumor Size in Low-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Analysis.

The French journal of urology·2026
Same author

Multi-institutional external validation of the European risk classification for high-grade Ta non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

World journal of urology·2026
Same author

<i>Ad-verse Effects:</i> Pharmaceutical Advertising Shifts Drug Recommendations by Consumer-Facing AI.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Reply by Authors.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same author

Exploring the Gut-Prostate Axis: Microbial Signatures Linked to Prostate Volume and Bladder Function.

The Prostate·2026
Same author

Positive Margin Location and Prostate Biopsy Route: A Consecutive Cohort Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Techniques.

Cancers·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.0K

一个基于机器学习的临床显著前列腺癌和在线风险计算器的新型预测模型.

Flavio Vasconcelos Ordones1, Paulo Roberto Kawano2, Lodewikus Vermeulen3

  • 1Tauranga Public Hospital, Tauranga, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand; University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Urology Department, UNESP, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

Urology
|November 13, 2024
PubMed
概括

一个新的机器学习模型使用PI-RADS分数和PSA密度准确预测临床显著的前列腺癌 (csPCa). 这种综合方法可以比单个预测器更好地进行检测.

更多相关视频

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.7K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.0K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.7K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

科学领域:

  • 泌尿器科 泌尿器科 泌尿器科 泌尿器科
  • 在瘤学瘤学.
  • 医疗信息学 医疗信息学

背景情况:

  • 前列腺癌的检测依赖于准确的风险分层.
  • 前列腺成像报告和数据系统 (PI-RADS) 评分和PSA密度 (PSAD) 是关键指标.
  • 预测模型可以提高临床显著前列腺癌 (csPCa) 的诊断准确性.

研究的目的:

  • 开发和验证用于预测csPCa.的机器学习模型.
  • 该模型整合了PI-RADS得分,PSAD和临床变量.
  • 评估模型的表现与个别预测因素的对比.

主要方法:

  • 分析了一组由1272名接受前列腺活检的患者组成的多国队列.
  • 数据包括年龄,BMI,PSA,前列腺体积,PI-RADS和活检史.
  • 拉索,XGBoost和LightGBM模型经过内部和外部的培训和验证.

主要成果:

  • 所有模型都实现了高的ROC-AUC值 (0.830-0.851).
  • 轻GBM表现出卓越的性能,ROC为0.851 (测试集) 和0.818 (外部数据集).
  • PI-RADS评分,PSAD和先前的活检史是最有影响力的变量.

结论:

  • 开发了一个强大的机器学习模型来检测csPCa.
  • 综合模型的表现明显优于个体预测器.
  • 该模型显示强大的内部和外部验证与良好的校准.