评估医学学生对研究和抄袭的态度:一项多地点研究
Andrija Pavlovic1, Nina Rajovic2, Srdjan Masic3
1Department of Humanities, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM
|November 16, 2024
概括
医学学生对研究和抄袭持积极态度. 将研究课程纳入课程可以增强科学兴趣,维护研究伦理.
科学领域:
- 医学教育 医学教育
- 研究伦理学研究伦理学
- 学术诚信 学术诚信
背景情况:
- 参与医学研究对于医疗保健的进步至关重要.
- 关于激励医学学生参与研究的因素的理解有限.
- "复制粘贴文化"和抄袭在电子学习环境中越来越令人担忧.
研究的目的:
- 评估医学学生对研究的态度.
- 为了评估医学学生对抄袭的态度.
- 检查对研究的态度 (ATR) 和对窃的态度 (ATP) 调查问卷的心理测量特性.
主要方法:
- 一项多中心研究,涉及从事研究的本科和研究生医学学生.
- 使用翻译和文化适应的ATR和ATP问卷对态度的评估.
- 确认因素分析,以评估仪器的有效性和可靠性.
主要成果:
- 793名医学学生填写了问卷,证明了出色的 (ATR) 和良好的 (ATP) 尺度可靠性.
- 确认因素分析验证了ATR的五因素结构和ATP的三因素结构.
- 医学学生对研究表现出积极的态度,在所有ATP领域获得了有利的成绩;年龄和博士学位水平影响了这些态度.
结论:
- 参与研究的医学学生对研究和抄袭都表现出有利的态度.
- 将研究课程纳入医学院课程可以培养对科学研究的更多兴趣.
- 建议调整课程以促进学生的研究伦理和诚信.
更多相关视频
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
3.5K
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
9.3K
相关概念视频
Obedience
32.8K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.8K
Surveys
14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
Ethics in Research
22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.2K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.2K
Longitudinal Research
11.9K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
11.9K
Blind Procedures
10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K
