Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Measuring Reaction Rates03:09

Measuring Reaction Rates

Polarimetry finds application in chemical kinetics to measure the concentration and reaction kinetics of optically active substances during a chemical reaction. Optically active substances have the capability of rotating the plane of polarization of linearly polarized light passing through them—a feature called optical rotation. Optical activity is attributed to the molecular structure of substances. Normal monochromatic light is unpolarized and possesses oscillations of the electrical field in...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation01:15

Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation

The plasma drug concentration-time curve is a crucial tool in pharmacokinetics, representing the drug's concentration in plasma at different time intervals post-administration. This curve illustrates the drug's journey from absorption into the systemic circulation, distribution to body tissues, and eventual elimination through excretion or biotransformation.
Two pivotal parameters are the minimum effective concentration (MEC) and the minimum toxic concentration (MTC). The MEC is the lowest drug...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Pancreatic kallikrein protects against diabetic retinopathy in KK Cg-A<sup>y</sup>/J and high-fat diet/streptozotocin-induced mouse models of type 2 diabetes.

Diabetologia·2019
Same author

A more efficient ocular delivery system of triamcinolone acetonide as eye drop to the posterior segment of the eye.

Drug delivery·2019
Same author

Novel Strategy of Gene Delivery System Based on Dendrimer Loaded Recombinant Hirudine Plasmid for Thrombus Targeting Therapy.

Molecular pharmaceutics·2019
Same author

A visible light photoredox catalyzed carbon radical-mediated generation of ortho-quinone methides for 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran synthesis.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2019
Same author

Prognostic factors of refractory NSCLC patients receiving anlotinib hydrochloride as the third- or further-line treatment.

Cancer biology & medicine·2019
Same author

A change-point analysis procedure based on weighted residuals to detect back random responding.

Psychological methods·2019
Same journal

A Simple Approach for Differential Test Functioning Based on Sum Scores.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Factor Retention in Large Factor Analysis Models: A Simulation Study Comparing 15 Methods.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Agreement and Alignment in Binary Rating Tasks: Strategic Convergence as an Equilibrium Outcome.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Interactions Between Termination Criteria and Ability Estimators in Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Identification and Diagnosis of Misreporting in Surveys.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

The Aggregated Latent Profile Index: Measuring Person Profile Differentiation Within a Bootstrap-Validated Latent Profile Space.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.2K

使用响应时间检测差异物品运行.

Qizhou Duan1, Ying Cheng1

  • 1University of Notre Dame, IN, USA.

Educational and psychological measurement
|November 18, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

本研究引入了一种回归方法,用于检测响应时间中的差异性项目功能 (DIF). 将显著性测试与ΔR2结合起来,为在教育评估中识别DIF项目提供了一种一致的方法.

关键词:
2018年PISA测试的结果是什么差异性项目的功能.效果大小的影响大小.回归分析是一种回归分析.响应时间模型的响应时间模型

更多相关视频

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.4K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.2K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.4K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K

科学领域:

  • 教育测量教育的测量
  • 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
  • 数据分析 数据分析

背景情况:

  • 差异性项目功能 (DIF) 对于公平测试至关重要.
  • 响应时间数据为项目性能提供了额外的见解.
  • 现有的DIF检测方法可能无法充分利用响应时间信息.

研究的目的:

  • 使用响应时间调查统一的差异物品功能 (DIF) 检测.
  • 建议和评估回归分析方法用于响应时间中的DIF检测.
  • 根据统计学意义和效果大小,比较标记DIF项目的不同标准.

主要方法:

  • 提出了一个回归模型,使用工作速度和组成员身份作为对数转换响应时间的预测因素.
  • 使用效果大小测量 (ΔR2,回归系数的百分比变化) 与显著性测试一起.
  • 进行了模拟研究,对样本大小,焦点组比例,DIF项目数量和DIF大小进行了变化.
  • 将该方法应用于PISA 2018数据以进行现实世界的验证.

主要成果:

  • 显著性测试本身在标记DIF项目方面过于严格.
  • 回归系数的百分比变化显示在各种条件中表现不一致.
  • 显著性测试与ΔR2的结合有效地使标记率持续降低.
  • 提出的方法证明了与真实世界PISA数据的实际实用性.

结论:

  • 使用 ΔR2 与显著性测试的回归方法为响应时间中统一的 DIF 检测提供了可靠的方法.
  • 与单独的显著性测试或百分比变化指标相比,这种方法提供了更好的准确性和一致性.
  • 为实施基于响应时间的DIF研究提供了指导方针.