非本地比本地承担更大的风险:在人类扰乱的环境中,这是一个优势吗?
Alfredo Escanciano Gómez1, Charlotte Ipenburg1, Ulrika Candolin2
1Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
BMC ecology and evolution
|November 18, 2024
概括
侵入性Palaemon elegans表现出比本地P.adspersus.具有更高的冒险行为. 尽管存在掠食风险,但这种大胆性有助于其在波罗的海成功增长.
科学领域:
- 生态生态学 生态生态学
- 侵入性物种 生物学 生物学
- 动物行为 动物行为
背景情况:
- 非本地物种的入侵是人类引发的重大生态挑战.
- 了解入侵促进因素和障碍对物种管理至关重要.
- 像高活动,大胆和攻击性这样的特征与入侵成功有关,但增加了掠夺者的易感性.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较入侵Palaemon elegans与波罗的海本土P.adspersus的冒险行为.
- 研究息地结构和感知到的掠食威胁如何影响本地和入侵物种的行为.
主要方法:
- 记录了两种的活动水平.
- 评估了与掠食风险相关的息地选择.
- 对模拟的掠夺威胁进行行为反应的测量.
主要成果:
- 侵入性 (P. elegans) 的风险承担能力明显高于本地 (P. adspersus).
- 本地根据息地和捕食者存在而调整行为,而入侵显示出较少的调整和更快地从感知到的威胁中恢复.
- 尽管承担了更高的风险,但入侵种群迅速扩大,现在超过了本地种群.
结论:
- 由于捕食鱼数量减少,捕食压力的降低可能会降低入侵物种冒险的成本.
- 由于人为肥胖化而增加的食物供应可能会支持入侵的种群增长.
- 在扰乱环境中评估行为最佳性对于理解入侵动态至关重要.
相关概念视频
Habitat Fragmentation
17.4K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
17.4K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
2.7K
A complete procedure of testing the hypothesis about a population mean is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
2.7K
Types of Selection
40.2K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.2K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
3.3K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.3K
Genetic Drift
39.5K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
39.5K
Predator-Prey Interactions
16.1K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.1K


