随机对照试验双额头跨直接电流刺激对渴望酒精使用障碍的渴望
Arundhati Gairola1, Anil Nischal1, Sujita Kumar Kar1
1Dept. of Psychiatry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Indian journal of psychological medicine
|November 20, 2024
概括
超直流刺激 (tDCS) 在急性酒精使用障碍 (AUD) 患者中减轻酒精渴望方面显示出希望. 这种神经调节技术是安全的,耐受性很好,提供了潜在的新管理选择.
科学领域:
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
- 神经调节是一种神经调节.
- 成 药物 药物 药物 药物
背景情况:
- 酒精使用障碍 (AUD) 在渴望管理方面提出了重大挑战.
- 像跨直流刺激 (tDCS) 这样的神经调节技术正在探索AUD治疗.
- 评估tDCS的疗效和对幸福感的影响对于AUD患者护理至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 评估tDCS在减少AUD患者饮酒渴望方面的有效性.
- 为了确定tDCS干预对AUD的安全性和耐受性.
- 在AUD中测量tDCS治疗后主观幸福感的变化.
主要方法:
- 随机对照试验比较活跃的tDCS与假装的tDCS,每组17名AUD患者.
- 在一周的时间内进行了五次tDCS疗程,针对2mA电流的背侧前额皮层 (DLPFC).
- 在第1,4和第8周评估酒精冲动 (AUQ) 和幸福感 (WHO-5) 以及副作用检查表.
主要成果:
- 与假药相比,活性tDCS在第1周和第4周显著减少了酒精的冲动,但在第8周却没有.
- 两组人都表现出改善的幸福度,活跃和假的tDCS之间没有显著差异.
- 观察到的副作用是轻微的,短暂的,不需要特殊的管理.
结论:
- tDCS可能是有效的急性管理的酒精渴望在AUD.
- 这种干预措施是安全的,并且被AUD患者容忍得很好.
- 需要进一步的研究,以了解AUD治疗中tDCS的长期疗效和最佳方案.
相关概念视频
Blind Procedures
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Blinding
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.


