准确性提示保护专业内容主持人免受虚假真相效应的影响
Hause Lin1,2, Marlyn Thomas Savio3, Xieyining Huang3
1Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 100 Main St, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
PNAS nexus
|November 20, 2024
概括
暴露于虚假陈述的内容管理员可能会因为虚假真相效应而相信这些陈述. 准确性思维干预有效地阻止了这种信念,即使在专业主持人和多样化的群体中也是如此.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 媒体研究 媒体研究
- 组织行为 组织行为
背景情况:
- 内容管理员经常接触有问题的内容,包括虚假的说法.
- 一个潜在的风险是主持人通过虚幻的真相效应将这些虚假内部化.
- 这种现象可能会影响主持人的判断力和幸福感.
研究的目的:
- 为了研究内容管理员的虚幻真相效应.
- 测试一种干预措施,减轻主持人对虚假的信念.
- 检查影响和干预跨文化和专业角色的普遍性.
主要方法:
- 一个实验室实地实验与一个全球内容调节公司 (N=199).
- 在印度 (N=997) 和菲律宾 (N=1,184) 的一般人口调查.
- 第二个实验室实地实验与专业主持人 (N=239) 测试准确性思维干预.
主要成果:
- 对虚假陈述的曝光使主持人对虚假陈述的信念增加了7.1%.
- 在初次接触时诱导准确性思维消除了对信念的负面影响.
- 在非西方人群和专业主持人中观察到虚幻真相效应和干预的保护力.
结论:
- 内容管理员容易受到虚幻真相效应的影响.
- 准确性思维干预是有效的防止对虚假的信念.
- 调查结果强调了心理干预在内容调节设置中的重要性.
相关概念视频
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
441
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
441
False Memories
71
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
71
Confirmation Biases
5.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.4K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
176
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
176
Groupthink
44.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.2K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K


