Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Depressive Disorders: MDD and Dysthymia01:27

Depressive Disorders: MDD and Dysthymia

61
Depressive disorders are a group of mental health conditions characterized by pervasive feelings of sadness, diminished pleasure in life, and a significant impact on daily functioning. These conditions are most prevalent in individuals during their 30s and affect women at twice the rate of men. Contrary to popular belief, younger individuals are generally more susceptible to these disorders than older adults. Two key types of depressive disorders include Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and...
61

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Determinants of implementation success for a digital single-session intervention for workplace mental health: Mixed methods evaluation in a cluster trial.

Internet interventions·2026
Same author

Implementation of a Serious Illness Conversation Program in a Health System: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Journal of palliative medicine·2026
Same author

COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy and postpartum and human milk feeding non-initiation and discontinuation.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Seizure prophylaxis in glioma surgery (SPRING): A multi-center, unblinded, randomized trial.

Neuro-oncology practice·2026
Same author

Language and racial disparities in COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and lactation.

Vaccine·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.5K

数据驱动的切线选择患者健康问卷-9 抑郁查工具

Brooke Levis1,2, Parash Mani Bhandari1, Dipika Neupane1

  • 1Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

JAMA network open
|November 22, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

使用小数据集来设置最佳切断分数的患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9) 可能会导致不准确的结果. 这项研究表明,与人口级数据相比,数据驱动的方法产生了不同的截止分数和偏差的准确性估计.

更多相关视频

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
04:19

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: May 10, 2022

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Connection Between Sleep Disorders and Cognitive Symptoms in Depression
04:33

Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Connection Between Sleep Disorders and Cognitive Symptoms in Depression

Published on: April 26, 2024

607

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.5K
A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
04:19

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: May 10, 2022

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Connection Between Sleep Disorders and Cognitive Symptoms in Depression
04:33

Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Connection Between Sleep Disorders and Cognitive Symptoms in Depression

Published on: April 26, 2024

607

科学领域:

  • 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
  • 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学

背景情况:

  • 测试准确性研究通常使用小数据集,同时选择最佳切断分数和准确性估计.
  • 这种方法可能导致偏离人口水平最佳得分和偏差的准确性估计.

研究的目的:

  • 评估数据驱动的方法如何同时选择最佳的患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9) 截止分数和估计准确度影响结果.
  • 具体来说,要评估与人口水平值相比,最佳截止分数和准确性估计的差异.

主要方法:

  • 利用来自个人参与者数据元分析 (IPDMA) 数据库的横截面数据来提高PHQ-9查准确度.
  • 从IPDMA人群中重新采样了1000项研究 (N=100, 200, 500, 1000),以模拟较小的数据集.
  • 使用Youden指数选择最佳切断分数,并将准确性估计与全人口数据进行比较.

主要成果:

  • 在模拟研究中的最佳切断分数与人口最佳 (8+) 相比,差异很大 (例如,N=100个样本中的2+到21+).
  • 只有17%的N=100样本和33%的N=1000样本确定了真正的最佳切断分数 (8+).
  • 在较小的样本中,过高估计了灵敏度 (例如,在N=100的6.4个百分点),而特异性基本上没有受到影响.

结论:

  • 同时选择最佳切断分数,并使用小型数据集上的数据驱动方法估计准确度,导致与人口值的实质差异.
  • 来自不够强大的研究或元分析的诊断准确性证据应谨慎解释.
  • 切断分数的推需要来自足够强大的研究或经过良好的元分析的强有力的证据.