方法决策及其对学校资金与教育成绩之间的感知关系的影响
Jeffrey A Shero1, Sara A Hart1,2
1Florida State University, Department of Psychology.
概括
根据分析方法和学生的社会经济地位 (SES),学校的资金对学生的成绩有不同的影响. 学生层面的资助缩小了低成绩者的成就差距,而学校层面的资助则扩大了这些差距.
科学领域:
- 教育政策 教育政策
- 教育金融教育融资
- 量化研究方法 量化研究方法
背景情况:
- 学校资金和学生成绩之间的关系是复杂的,并进行了辩论.
- 不同的分析方法产生矛盾的结果,影响政策决策.
- 社会经济地位 (SES) 是影响教育成绩的关键因素.
研究的目的:
- 调查不同研究方法如何影响学校资金与学生成绩之间的关系.
- 检查聚合水平 (学生与学校) 和共变量包含 (SES) 对这些发现的影响.
- 为基于证据的教育融资政策提供信息.
主要方法:
- 使用量子回归分析来检查成就分布.
- 在学生和学校两级分析了数据.
- 社会经济地位 (SES) 被列入作为一个关键的共同变量.
主要成果:
- 在不同成就量度中观察到融资与成就关系的显著差异.
- 在学生层面和学校层面的分析产生了不同的结果.
- 对SES的控制大大改变了所有分析的结果.
- 学生层面的资金减少了低成绩学生的成绩差距,而学校层面的资金扩大了这些差距.
结论:
- 方法选择对有关学校资金和成绩的结论有深远的影响.
- SES是教育研究中必须控制的关键混.
- 政策影响根据在学生或学校层面分析资金是否存在显著差异.
更多相关视频
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
640
06:33Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
Published on: October 11, 2018
6.7K
相关概念视频
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Bias
3.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.7K
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Framing Effects
7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
