全球见解:ChatGPT对学术和研究写作,创造力和窃政策的影响
Muhammad Abid Malik1, Amjad Islam Amjad2, Sarfraz Aslam3
1Shandong Vocational University of Foreign Affairs, Jinan, China.
Frontiers in research metrics and analytics
|November 25, 2024
概括
研究人员发现,聊天生成预训练变压器 (ChatGPT) 在学术写作中提供了机会和节省时间. 然而,人们对技能退化和抄袭存在担忧,这表明需要对大型语言模型 (LLM) 的规范使用.
科学领域:
- 在学术界的人工智能.
- 研究 写作 伦理学
- 学术诚信 学术诚信
背景情况:
- 像ChatGPT这样的大型语言模型 (LLM) 的快速发展在学术和研究写作中带来了新的挑战和机遇.
- 了解人工智能工具对创意和抄袭的既定概念的影响,对于保持学术标准至关重要.
- 围绕学术诚信的现有政策和做法可能需要根据人工智能产生的内容重新评估.
研究的目的:
- 探索ChatGPT对学术和研究写作的创意和窃的概念,参数,政策和实践的影响.
- 收集国际研究人员对使用ChatGPT.com的感知和经验的见解.
- 识别学术作者和原创性的定义和理解中的潜在转变.
主要方法:
- 采用定性研究方法,使用半结构面试.
- 数据来自10个不同国家的10名研究人员组成的多元化小组.
- 使用NVivo软件进行系统的数据分析,以确定关键主题.
主要成果:
- 出现了五个主要主题:机会,人类援助,激发思考,节省时间和对ChatGPT的负面态度.
- 虽然研究人员承认这些好处,但人们普遍担心写作技能的下降和抄袭的增加.
- 形成了一个共识,即ChatGPT可以在学术环境中重新定义创意和窃的概念.
结论:
- 这项研究表明,写作中的创造力可能会演变,包括熟练使用像ChatGPT这样的AI工具.
- 机器生成的文本对传统的窃定义构成挑战,需要明确的认可准则.
- 研究人员建议在学术写作中允许ChatGPT,但主张监管,限制使用,并适当归因以维护学术完整性.
相关概念视频
Groupthink
44.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.2K
Group Polarization
34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
Conformity
45.0K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.0K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Social Proof
27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K
Social Loafing
34.6K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.6K


