在多方利益相关者之间建立及时的共识:一个适应的名义集团技术
Deniz Cetin-Sahin1,2, Geneviève Arsenault-Lapierre3, Clara Bolster-Foucault4
1Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research at the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada deniz.sahin@mail.mcgill.ca.
Annals of family medicine
|November 25, 2024
概括
一种适应的名义组技术有效地在各种医疗保健利益相关者之间达成共识. 这种方法确保了代表性,并节省了时间,确定了老年人优先照顾的领域.
科学领域:
- 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究
- 老年医疗护理 医疗护理
- 定性研究方法 定性研究方法
背景情况:
- 在初级医疗保健研究中,不同利益相关者之间达成共识至关重要.
- 传统的名义集团技术面临着利益相关者代表性和时间效率方面的挑战.
- 需要有效的共识建设方法来为研究和政策提供信息.
研究的目的:
- 展示一种适应的名义集团技术,以有效地在不同利益相关者之间达成共识.
- 为65岁及以上的个人确定优先护理领域.
- 减轻与传统共识方法相关的代表性和时间挑战.
主要方法:
- 采用了经过调整的名义组技术,采用了4个关键策略.
- 招募了4个不同的利益相关者群体 (老年人,临床医生,经理,决策者) 使用最大变异和雪球采样.
- 集成的远程工具,个别的预诱导活动和适应性讨论,以提高参与度和有效性.
主要成果:
- 在与28名参与者进行一轮讨论后,在优先领域"症状,功能和护理质量"上达成共识.
- 适应性小组讨论和远程工具在达成共识的过程中被证明是最有效的.
- 参与者报告说,他们自由表达意见,有些人建议研究目标与实践/政策影响之间更好地协调.
结论:
- 调整名义组技术是一种有效和丰富的方法,可以及时在各种医疗保健利益相关者之间建立共识.
- 这种方法为各个领域的医疗保健研究人员提供了一种有价值的方法.
- 调整后的技术成功地解决了传统方法的局限性,提高了参与和效率.
相关概念视频
01:34Groupthink
44.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.2K
04:49Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
01:31In- and Out-Groups
38.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.9K
01:01Group Polarization
34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
02:01Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
00:52Social Proof
27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K