Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

2.7K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.7K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

83
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
83
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

229
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
229
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

152
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
152

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Model-based adaptive randomization procedures for heteroscedasticity of treatment responses.

Statistical methods in medical research·2023
Same author

Subgroup-adaptive randomization for subgroup confirmation in clinical trials.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2020
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A robust neural network with random effects for subject-specific prediction of clustered count data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Joint analysis of longitudinal and recurrent event data: A functional regression approach with autoregressive frailty.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K

基于模型的最佳随机化程序,用于治疗-共变相互作用试验.

Zhongqiang Liu1

  • 1School of Mathematics and Information Science, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China.

Statistical methods in medical research
|November 26, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

我们介绍基于模型的尼曼分配 (MNA),这是一种用于临床试验的新型随机化程序. MNA增强了治疗-共变相互作用测试的效果,即使治疗反应的差异不均.

关键词:
一个MNA,一个MNA.不同的性 异性性最佳的分配比率是最佳的分配比率.权力,权力,权力,权力.治疗共变的相互作用

更多相关视频

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

440

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

440

科学领域:

  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 临床试验设计 临床试验设计
  • 统计推理 统计推理

背景情况:

  • 线性模型是临床试验中的标准,但往往违反了像同性恋等假设.
  • 违反假设会降低对治疗-共变体相互作用的测试的效力.
  • 现有的方法可能无法充分解决治疗反应中的异种性复杂性.

研究的目的:

  • 开发基于模型的最佳随机化程序,从根本上提高治疗-共变相互作用测试的功率.
  • 在临床试验设计中解决治疗反应中的异种性.
  • 为了将针对尼曼分配的响应适应性随机化概括.

主要方法:

  • 开发基于模型的尼曼分配 (MNA),一种最佳随机化程序.
  • 理论证明MNA能够最大限度地提高治疗-共变相互作用试验的效果.
  • 模拟研究将MNA与Pocock和Simon的最小化和响应适应性随机化进行比较,以异种类型的线性模型为目标的尼曼分配 (RAR-NA).

主要成果:

  • MNA是RAR-NA的泛化,提供了更好的功率.
  • 与现有方法相比,MNA在检测系统效应和治疗-共变相互作用方面表现出更强的能力,即使是模型错误规范.
  • 样本大小估计方面的考虑在MNA框架内得到解决.

结论:

  • 基于模型的尼曼分配 (MNA) 显著提高了在异种临床试验中治疗-共变相互作用测试的功率.
  • 在各种条件下,MNA提供了一种强大的随机化方法,在各种条件下优于传统方法.
  • 该程序的效率得到了理论分析和模拟研究的支持,在精神分裂症试验案例研究中展示了实际含义.