Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

79
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
79
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

38.8K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
38.8K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Beyond Retrieval Competition: Asymmetric Effects of Retroactive and Proactive Interference in Associative Memory.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Retrieval Competition in Proactive Interference: Effects of Encoding Strength and Consolidation in the Modified Modified Free Recall Paradigm.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Value-Directed Remembering: A Dual-Process Perspective.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

The Effects of Teacher Rewards and Their Types on Preschool Children's Selective Trust.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Was the study time allocation based on expectation-maximization in value-test likelihood tradeoff situation?

Psychological research·2025
Same author

The Effect of Item Strength on Retrieval-Induced Forgetting in Social Interaction.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

640

研究时间分配中的有限理性:基于风险选择框架效应的证据.

Hui Xu1, Yuanxia Gao1, Qian Xiao1,2

  • 1Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 27, 2024
PubMed
概括

学习者在分配考试学习时间时表现出有限的理性,因为框架效应会影响他们的决策,尽管可能性相等. 这在教育背景下挑战了传统的预期效用理论.

关键词:
这是一个ABR模型.有局限的理性.预期的实用性理论.框架效果的框架效果是什么项目选择 项目选择超认知 (metacognition) 是一种表认知.超记忆 超记忆 超记忆研究时间分配研究时间分配.

更多相关视频

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

640
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 教育心理学教育心理学
  • 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.

背景情况:

  • 学生在准备标准化英语考试时面临价值测试概率权衡.
  • 优化学习时间需要平衡项目难度,点值和测试概率.

研究的目的:

  • 调查框架效应如何影响模拟考试环境中的学习时间分配.
  • 确定研究时间分配是否表现出有限的理性,偏离预期效用理论.

主要方法:

  • 41名大学生对两个项目类型进行了自我调节的学习时间:1分 (90%的概率) 和9分 (10%的概率).
  • 用不同的框架呈现项目概率:强调测试概率与不测试概率.
  • 研究人员检查了风险选择框架对研究时间分配的影响.

主要成果:

  • 在两种同等框架之间,研究时间分配有显著差异.
  • 框架效应表明偏离了纯粹理性的决策.
  • 参与者将更多的时间分配给那些具有更高测试概率的项目.

结论:

  • 研究时间分配受到框架效应的影响,表明有界的理性.
  • 这些发现与预期效用理论在这种学习环境中的预测相矛盾.
  • 了解认知偏见对于改善学习策略和教育干预至关重要.