研究时间分配中的有限理性:基于风险选择框架效应的证据
Hui Xu1, Yuanxia Gao1, Qian Xiao1,2
1Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 27, 2024
概括
学习者在分配考试学习时间时表现出有限的理性,因为框架效应会影响他们的决策,尽管可能性相等. 这在教育背景下挑战了传统的预期效用理论.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 教育心理学教育心理学
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
背景情况:
- 学生在准备标准化英语考试时面临价值测试概率权衡.
- 优化学习时间需要平衡项目难度,点值和测试概率.
研究的目的:
- 调查框架效应如何影响模拟考试环境中的学习时间分配.
- 确定研究时间分配是否表现出有限的理性,偏离预期效用理论.
主要方法:
- 41名大学生对两个项目类型进行了自我调节的学习时间:1分 (90%的概率) 和9分 (10%的概率).
- 用不同的框架呈现项目概率:强调测试概率与不测试概率.
- 研究人员检查了风险选择框架对研究时间分配的影响.
主要成果:
- 在两种同等框架之间,研究时间分配有显著差异.
- 框架效应表明偏离了纯粹理性的决策.
- 参与者将更多的时间分配给那些具有更高测试概率的项目.
结论:
- 研究时间分配受到框架效应的影响,表明有界的理性.
- 这些发现与预期效用理论在这种学习环境中的预测相矛盾.
- 了解认知偏见对于改善学习策略和教育干预至关重要.
相关概念视频
Framing Effects
7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
79
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
79
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
38.8K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
38.8K


