Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)01:27

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

45
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) serves as the primary classification system for mental health disorders, providing standardized diagnostic criteria for clinicians and researchers. First published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1952, the DSM has undergone several revisions to reflect evolving psychiatric understanding. The fifth edition, DSM-5, released in 2013, introduced key updates that expanded diagnostic categories and modified diagnostic...
45

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same authorSame journal

Toward Global Standards for Disaster Medical Specialists: A Scoping Review of Competencies for Emergency Medical Teams.

Disaster medicine and public health preparedness·2026
Same author

Choosing the Right Measure of Effect: Guidance for Authors Reporting Binary Outcomes.

Prehospital and disaster medicine·2026
Same author

Leveraging medical students' pre-matriculation and medical school experiences in leadership education and development.

BMJ leader·2026
Same author

Emergency department medical care during civil unrest: a narrative review.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Prehospital tourniquet use and associated outcomes in a low-resource conflict setting: prospective observational casualty data and tourniquet classification system from the Sahel.

BMJ military health·2026
Same author

Estimated impact of the Aliso Canyon disaster on emergency department visits.

Environment international·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K

SDMPH 10周年纪念大会 修改的德尔菲研究

Eric S Weinstein1,2,3, Joseph Cuthbertson4,5, Frederick Burkle6

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

Disaster medicine and public health preparedness
|November 27, 2024
PubMed
概括

研究人员使用了德尔菲方法来达成专家的共识,以推进研究的声明. 这种共识指导着未来的教育,研究和培训举措.

关键词:
灾难医学 灾难医学教育教育教育教育的教育.大规模伤亡事件事件.公共卫生专业人员的公共卫生专业人员选分类是为了分类.武器武器的武器武器的武器.

更多相关视频

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

4.2K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
05:04

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

857

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K
Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

4.2K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
05:04

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

857

科学领域:

  • 公共卫生和流行病学
  • 研究方法研究方法研究方法学

背景情况:

  • 牙科医学公共卫生学院 (SDMPH) 的10周年纪念大会为研究进步提供了一个平台.
  • 一个关键的机会是利用Delphi方法来实现关于研究相关陈述的共识.

研究的目的:

  • 通过寻求专家对使用德尔菲方法论的陈述达成共识来推进研究.
  • 根据专家批准的陈述指导未来的教育,研究和培训.

主要方法:

  • 确定了来自会议与会者和SDMPH成员的Delphi专家.
  • 专家们以7分级评价声明的一致性;共识定义为标准偏差<=1.
  • 利用三轮的Delphi过程,对群体平均答案进行反,以达成共识.

主要成果:

  • 37名专家参加了第一轮,34名专家完成了三轮.
  • 在德尔菲进程之后,有35个声明达成了专家共识.
  • 3个声明没有达成共识,因此被排除在最终报告之外.

结论:

  • 德尔菲技术成功地建立了对SDMPH演讲者的陈述的专家共识.
  • 这些共识声明为未来的教育,研究和培训工作提供了基础.