在小学晚期的口语干预是有效的:来自随机对照试验的证据
Rosanne Esposito1,2, Arne Lervag3, Charles Hulme2,4
1University College London, London, UK.
Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines
|December 2, 2024
概括
口语语言识字干预 (OLLI) 计划显著改善了8-9岁学生的口语和写作技能. 这种可扩展的,低成本的干预措施支持在晚年小学阶段的教育成就.
科学领域:
- 教育心理学教育心理学
- 发展心理学 发展心理学
- 应用语言学 应用语言学
背景情况:
- 口语能力对于学业成功至关重要,但干预措施往往忽视了以后的小学年.
- 现有的语言支持计划主要针对学龄前和早期学龄儿童.
- 口语扫盲干预 (OLLI) 计划是为了弥补老年小学生的这一差距而开发的.
研究的目的:
- 开发和评估8-9岁儿童口语语言技能较弱的OLLI计划的有效性.
- 确定OLLI是否能提高小学学生的口头语言能力和书面表达.
- 评估OLLI计划的可扩展性和成本效益.
主要方法:
- 在33所学校进行了一项随机对照试验,涉及1423名8-9岁儿童.
- 使用LanguageScreen应用程序评估语言技能,得分最低的296名儿童被随机分配到干预或对照组.
- 干预组接受了20周的个人和小组课程的OLLI课程,而对照组接受了标准教学.
主要成果:
- 与对照组相比,OLLI干预组的儿童在标准化口语语言测量中表现出明显更大的改善 (d=0.38).
- 在干预组中,OLLI计划还使得干预组的书面表达能力显著提高 (d=0.42).
- 这些改进在统计学上是显著的,表明了OLLI计划的积极影响.
结论:
- OLLI计划有效地提高了小学儿童的口语和书面表达技巧.
- 研究结果表明,OLLI可以提高初中后期学生的教育成绩.
- OLLI程序是为大规模实施而设计的,是语言支持的成本效益高的解决方案.
更多相关视频
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
3.7K
08:05Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
7.5K
相关概念视频
Language Development
317
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
317
Language and Cognition
323
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
323
