Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

188
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
188
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

78
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
78
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

175
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
175
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

3.3K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.3K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.4K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.4K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

102
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
102

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

Rank-based learning: a novel high-throughput algorithm resilient to missing data and effective for datasets with small sample size.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Systemic Immune Correlates of Long-term Survival after Delta-24-RGD Based on the Therapeutic Adenovirus for Recurrent Glioblastoma Effect Trial (TARGET).

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

The LEAP Study: A Multicenter Biospecimen and Imaging Resource for Lung Cancer Screening.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2025
Same author

SMAGS-LASSO: A Novel Feature Selection Method for Sensitivity Maximization in Early Cancer Detection.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2025
Same author

Breast cancer risk assessment: current challenges and the emerging role of blood-based protein biomarkers.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2025
Same journal

Will they use it? Patient and provider acceptance of chatbot screening and counseling for hereditary cancer syndromes in a geographically underserved population.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same journal

The Clinical Application of Refined Risk Estimates (caRe) Study in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same journal

Simvastatin Treatment in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: a Phase II Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial Shows Reduction in IL-6 Levels.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same journal

A Neural Network-Enabled, Enzymatic cfDNA Methylation Assay for Colorectal Cancer Early Detection.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same journal

Comparative Analysis of Breast and Cervical Screening Adaptability at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same journal

Active monitoring versus surgical excision for atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K

对于二进制分类的给定特异性的新型灵敏度最大化方法.

Seyyed Mahmood Ghasemi1, Chunhui Gu1, Johannes F Fahrmann2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|December 2, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

一种名为在给定的特异性 (SMAGS) 灵敏度最大化的新方法改善了癌症的早期检测. 通过优化生物标志物组合规则以提高灵敏度和特异性,SMAGS增强了后勤回归.

更多相关视频

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

19.9K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

19.9K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.6K

科学领域:

  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 机器学习 机器学习
  • 生物标志物发现发现

背景情况:

  • 后勤回归 (LR) 在癌症早期检测中很常见,但可能无法优化灵敏度或特异性.
  • 在LR中最大概率估计可以限制组合规则的有效性.

研究的目的:

  • 引入一个改进的回归框架,在给定的特异性 (SMAGS) 上最大化灵敏度,用于二进制分类.
  • 开发SMAGS以找到最佳的线性决策规则,以最大限度地提高在给定特异性的灵敏度或反之.
  • 扩大特征选择的框架,以提高灵敏度和特异性.

主要方法:

  • 在给定的特异性 (SMAGS) 框架下开发了对二进制分类的灵敏度最大化.
  • 应用SMAGS来找到优化敏感性和特异性权衡的线性决策规则.
  • 扩展SMAGS用于特征选择,以最大限度地提高灵敏度和特异性.

主要成果:

  • 与标准物流回归相比,SMAGS表现得更好.
  • 在结直肠癌CancerSEEK数据集中,SMAGS在98.5%的特异性下实现了14%的灵敏度改善.
  • 该研究报告了0.57的灵敏度,与LR的0.31相比 (P <0.05).

结论:

  • 在早期检测中,SMAGS为物流回归提供了一个优质的替代方案,用于开发生物标志物组合规则.
  • 该方法适用于各种生物标志物和早期检测研究,提高了诊断准确度.
  • SMAGS为特征选择和优化诊断性能提供了一个强大的方法.