关于解释和推理在令人信服的谬论中的相互作用
Léo Picat1, Salvador Mascarenhas2
1UFR de médecine, Université Paris Cité.
Cognitive science
|December 3, 2024
概括
演推理中的失败可能源于解释,而不仅仅是有缺陷的推理. 我们的研究表明,认知负载对基于解释的错误的影响更大,支持推理和解释的两要素模型.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 语言学的语言学.
- 逻辑 逻辑 逻辑 逻辑
背景情况:
- 演推理失败通常归因于有缺陷的推理过程.
- 从类似断层的元素中得出虚幻的推断是研究的一个关键领域.
- 其他解释表明解释,而不仅仅是推理,是这些谬论的基础.
研究的目的:
- 提出和测试一个由两个因素组成的演谬误的解释,整合推理和解释过程.
- 调查解释机制在虚幻推理中的作用.
- 区分基于推理和基于解释的演错误的解释.
主要方法:
- 使用双任务模式操纵认知负载的实验设计.
- 使用推理任务,与更简单的真实价值判断任务不同.
- 比较认知负载对不同类型虚幻推理的影响.
主要成果:
- 认知负载显著影响了预测基于解释的虚幻推理.
- 这些发现支持一种模型,其中解释在明显的演推理失败中起着至关重要的作用.
- 实验证据表明推理和解释之间的相互作用.
结论:
- 演谬误是由于推理和解释因素的结合而产生的.
- 解释在理解虚幻推理方面发挥着至关重要的作用.
- 未来的研究应该整合语言语义学和推理心理学,以澄清推理-解释界限.
相关概念视频
Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Reasoning
64
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
64
Inductive Reasoning
60.1K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.1K
Routes of Persuasion
63.8K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
63.8K
Deductive Reasoning
55.0K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.0K


