Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

The Memphis SOUND Project: The Development of a Community-Based Research Project to Address Hearing Health Disparities Among Black Adults Who Qualify for Cochlear Implants.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2024
Same author

The Effect of Speech Perception in Noise on Arabic and Spanish Bilingual Listeners.

American journal of audiology·2022
Same author

Listening Effort and Speech Perception Performance Using Different Facemasks.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2022
Same author

Validation of Male Talker Recordings of the Spanish Pediatric Speech Recognition Threshold Test and the Spanish Pediatric Picture Identification Test.

American journal of audiology·2022

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.3K

录制文字识别测试值得花时间.

Allie Austin1, Kathryn Ladner1, Lisa Lucks Mendel1

  • 1School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Memphis, TN.

American journal of audiology
|December 3, 2024
PubMed
概括

监控实时语音 (MLV) 文字识别测试更快,但在测试者之间具有很高的变化. 记录的刺激 (计算机辅助,CA) 建议用于准确评估MLV导致的听力损失.

科学领域:

  • 听力学 听力学是指听力学.
  • 语音语言病理学 语言病理学
  • 听力科学 听力科学

背景情况:

  • 监控实时语音 (MLV) 是一种常见的方法,用于在听力学中呈现词识别刺激.
  • 然而,人们对其固有的变性和对测试结果的潜在影响存在担忧.
  • 最佳实践指南经常建议使用记录的刺激来实现更大的标准化.

研究的目的:

  • 研究使用监控实时语音 (MLV) 与录制的刺激 (计算机辅助,CA) 进行文字识别测试的施用时间的变化.
  • 为了比较MLV和CA呈现方法之间的文字识别分数 (WRS) 的准确性.
  • 鼓励听力学家采用标准化,记录的刺激来改善临床实践.

主要方法:

  • 使用50个单词的NU-6列表进行了词识别测试,参与者具有典型的听力 (TH) 和听力损失 (HL).
  • 通过MLV和CA (直接听力计播放) 呈现刺激.
  • 注射时间和WRS被记录下来,并在介绍方法和参与者群体之间进行比较.

主要成果:

  • 对于TH和HL组,MLV呈现的速度明显快于CA.
  • 在测试者之间,与CA相比,在MLV中观察到药物施用时间的变异性显著更大.

更多相关视频

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.3K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.4K
  • 在TH和HL组之间,WRS仅与CA有显著差异,这表明MLV对听力损失的敏感性较低.
  • 结论:

    • 尽管施用速度更快,但MLV的高可变性影响了结果的临床效用.
    • 记录的刺激 (CA) 提供了更可靠和敏感的听力损失评估.
    • 强烈建议在听力学实践中使用记录的词识别刺激的标准化使用.