Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.9K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

183
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
183
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.2K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.2K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Thalamocortical seizure onset patterns in drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Brain communications·2026
Same author

Electrical signatures of divergent connectivity in the human subgenual cingulate cortex.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

A stereotactic laser interstitial thermal therapy strategy to flank dense calcifications within epileptogenic lesions: illustrative case.

Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons·2026
Same author

Development of an Educational Curriculum for the Surgical Implantation of DBS Systems.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026
Same author

AI-based discovery of functional boundaries in the human brain from intraoperative electrophysiology.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Sensory Function Improves With Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Parkinson's: A Network Analysis.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Building An Open-source Robotic Stereotaxic Instrument
11:40

Building An Open-source Robotic Stereotaxic Instrument

Published on: October 29, 2013

14.9K

在立体系统中描述不准确性的一般框架.

Michael A Jensen1, Joseph S Neimat2, Panagiotis Kerezoudis1

  • 1Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester , Minnesota , USA.

Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)
|December 3, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

一个新的框架识别和分类了立体手术系统中目标错误的来源. 这个工具有助于分析各种神经外科机器人平台的不准确性,以提高精度.

更多相关视频

Operative Technique and Nuances for the Stereoelectroencephalographic SEEG Methodology Utilizing a Robotic Stereotactic Guidance System
04:50

Operative Technique and Nuances for the Stereoelectroencephalographic SEEG Methodology Utilizing a Robotic Stereotactic Guidance System

Published on: June 9, 2023

3.5K
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Building An Open-source Robotic Stereotaxic Instrument
11:40

Building An Open-source Robotic Stereotaxic Instrument

Published on: October 29, 2013

14.9K
Operative Technique and Nuances for the Stereoelectroencephalographic SEEG Methodology Utilizing a Robotic Stereotactic Guidance System
04:50

Operative Technique and Nuances for the Stereoelectroencephalographic SEEG Methodology Utilizing a Robotic Stereotactic Guidance System

Published on: June 9, 2023

3.5K
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.4K

科学领域:

  • 神经外科和医疗机器人技术
  • 外科导航和准确性 医疗导航和准确性

背景情况:

  • 立体术程序需要高精度,以获得最佳的外科结果.
  • 了解目标错误的来源对于提高立体神经外科手术准确度至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 描述一种通用框架来描述刻板的不准确性来源.
  • 提供一种统一的方法来分析立体战术系统中的定位错误.

主要方法:

  • 在文献中搜索 (1969-2024) 关于立体系统不准确性的研究.
  • 对10个立体系统 (ROSA,Neuromate,马佐尔文艺复兴,ExcelsiusGPS,Cirq,StarFix,Nexframe,ClearPoint,CRW,Leksell) 的分析. 这是一个很好的例子.
  • 基于"报告准则"的框架的开发 定性研究指南.

主要成果:

  • 创建了一个包含5个领域的框架:成像,注册,机械精度,目标规划和调整以及轨迹规划和调整.
  • 该框架用于分析10个不同的立体系统.
  • 详细的插图提供了刻板印象的不准确性.

结论:

  • 开发的框架作为分析立体系统错误的标签.
  • 对错误源的概念理解有助于从业人员将框架应用于他们特定的立体系统.
  • 这项工作旨在提高立体手术手术程序的准确性和结果.