重新思考团队和培训在地缘政治预测中的作用:不受控制的方法变异对统计结论的影响
Clifford E Hauenstein1, Rick P Thomas1, David A Illingworth2
1School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Psychological science
|December 4, 2024
概括
在团队中工作和概率培训可能不会提高地缘政治预测的准确性. 统计控制揭示了外部变量,这些变量减少或扭转了这些干预措施的好处,使得识别超级预测者的特征变得复杂.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 决策科学 决策科学 决策科学
- 地缘政治分析
背景情况:
- 以前的研究表明,团队合作和概率培训可以提高地缘政治预测.
- 这些干预与在地缘政治比赛中提高预测能力有关.
研究的目的:
- 重新评估团队合作和概率培训对预测能力的影响.
- 调查外部变量在预测业绩中的作用.
- 识别潜伏的特征,区分超级预测者.
主要方法:
- 利用一个项目响应理论 (IRT) 框架来建模潜在的预测能力.
- 对影响预测选择的外部变量进行统计控制.
- 分析了地缘政治预测锦标赛的数据.
主要成果:
- 隐藏能力和预测准确度之间的关系在对外变量进行控制后发生了变化.
- 外在变量大大减少或扭转了团队和培训的积极影响.
- 与战略响应相关的潜在特征突出超级预测者,但掩盖了潜在因素.
结论:
- 关于团队工作和培训的好处的最初结论需要重新评估.
- 外在变量显著介导实验操纵对预测能力的影响.
- 鉴定超级预测成功背后的精确因素仍然是具有挑战性的,因为战略响应特征.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Random Error
821
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
821
Random and Systematic Errors
10.8K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.8K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
475
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
475
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
646
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
646
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
73.4K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
73.4K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K


