相关实验视频
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.3K
让网络子组的领导人更紧密地联系在一起,并不能促进共识共识
Matthew I Jones1,2,3, Nicholas A Christakis4,5,6
1Yale Institute for Network Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. matt.jones@yale.edu.
Scientific reports
|December 5, 2024
概括
噪音阻碍了群体的共识,而领导力影响行为,但不是基于领导者距离的共识概率. 网络群体在决策过程中面临着挑战.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 网络科学 网络科学
- 计算社会科学 计算社会科学
背景情况:
- 在网络群体中,形成共识是具有挑战性的,特别是当参与者抵制妥协时.
- 领导者对于引导群体达成共识至关重要.
- 领导地位和信号噪声在共识动态中的作用尚未完全理解.
研究的目的:
- 调查领导者之间的地理距离和信号噪声对网络群体共识形成的影响.
- 检查领导力如何影响群体内的个人行为,旨在达成共识.
主要方法:
- 在216个实验小组中招募了3,456名参与者.
- 在领导者 (1-4) 和噪音水平 (0%, 5%, 10%) 之间操纵的地理距离.
- 观察到的群体共识概率和共识的时间.
主要成果:
- 增加的噪音显著降低了达成共识的可能性,并增加了达成共识的时间.
- 领导角色改变了参与者的行为,促进了合规性 ("随流").
- 领导者之间的地理距离对共识概率没有显著的影响.
结论:
- 信号噪声是群体共识的一个重大障碍.
- 虽然领导力影响群体动态,但领导者的空间布局 (地理距离) 似乎并不对达成共识至关重要.
- 未来的研究应该探索领导者影响共识的其他网络属性.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Groupthink
44.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.2K
Relationship Formation
39.7K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.7K
Group Polarization
34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
In- and Out-Groups
38.8K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.8K
Social Proof
27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K

