探索社区劣势与大麻零售密度之间的关联:多项措施分析
Lindsay Kephart1, Vaughan W Rees1, S V Subramanian2
1Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, 7th Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Health & place
|December 13, 2024
概括
邻居的劣势与各种措施中较高的大麻零售密度有关. 这凸显了在公共卫生监督和政策中使用多重密度指标的必要性,以解决贫困地区的集群问题.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 城市规划 城市规划
- 大麻政策 大麻政策 大麻政策
背景情况:
- 越来越多的人对邻里处于不利地位和大麻零售密度的兴趣.
- 较高的大麻零售密度与大麻使用量增加有关.
- 对于不同密度测量如何影响这种关系的理解有限.
研究的目的:
- 探索社区优势/劣势和美国四个大麻零售密度指标之间的关系.
- 评估不同社会经济和种族因素如何影响大麻零售商的销售.
- 为大麻零售监管提供公共卫生和政策策略的信息.
主要方法:
- 利用了来自18个州的5,586家获得许可的娱乐大麻零售商的数据.
- 计算了四种零售密度指标:每块土地的数量,每千人口的数量,每平方英里的数量和每10英里的道路数量.
- 采用多级回归模型与极端度指数 (ICE) 测量邻里优势/劣势.
主要成果:
- 与优势地区相比,高经济和种族/经济劣势地区在所有措施中都显示出较高的大麻零售密度.
- 种族化人口度与每平方英里和道路密度较高相关,但不是每块土地或每人口.
- 结构性劣势是大麻零售集群的重要预测因素.
结论:
- 大麻零售密度在具有重大结构劣势的社区中不成比例地高.
- 建议使用多重密度测量来准确监测和政策评估.
- 敦促决策者制定战略,减少大麻零售商在低收入和种族化社区的集中.
相关概念视频
Factorial Design
13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation
617
The plasma drug concentration-time curve is a crucial tool in pharmacokinetics, representing the drug's concentration in plasma at different time intervals post-administration. This curve illustrates the drug's journey from absorption into the systemic circulation, distribution to body tissues, and eventual elimination through excretion or biotransformation.
Two pivotal parameters are the minimum effective concentration (MEC) and the minimum toxic concentration (MTC). The MEC is the...
Two pivotal parameters are the minimum effective concentration (MEC) and the minimum toxic concentration (MTC). The MEC is the...
617
Scatter Plot
6.8K
The most common and easiest way to display the relationship between two variables, x and y, is a scatter plot. A scatter plot shows the direction of a relationship between the variables. A clear direction happens when there is either:
6.8K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Correlations
32.6K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
32.6K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
144
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
144


