Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

120
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
120
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

87
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
87
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Right ventricular dysfunction: an overlooked predictor of sudden cardiac death and arrhythmic events-a meta-analysis.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2026
Same author

Vocal Health of Pastors in the Protestant Church in Germany.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2026
Same author

The present and the future of risk stratification for and prevention of sudden cardiac death: A Heart Rhythm Society think tank meeting.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Ventricular Fibrillation Without Hemodynamic Deterioration: An Electrocardiographic Paradox Explained by Heterotopic Heart Transplantation.

JACC. Case reports·2026
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation in end-stage heart failure with atrial fibrillation: Insights from CASTLE-HTx.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Effect of RYGB Limb Lengths on HbA1c in Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.

Obesity surgery·2026
Same journal

Prehabilitation in lung cancer patients undergoing lung resection surgery (Fit4LungNeo): study protocol.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same journal

Orforglipron for the treatment of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea in adults with obesity or overweight: Study design and baseline characteristics of ATTAIN-OSA, a phase 3 trial.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same journal

Implementation science and the clinical trial workforce: A national needs assessment of training and practice.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same journal

Understanding recruitment challenges in Swiss oncology trials: Patient voices from focus groups.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of couple-based maternity education on husbands' involvement in maternity continuum of care service utilization in rural communities of Central Ethiopia: Protocol of cluster randomized controlled trial.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same journal

The design of a small Bayesian hybrid-controlled trial utilizing time-to-event data from six published sources that used best alternative care to treat liver-predominant metastasis from primary ocular melanoma.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K

一个简单的失明指数随机对照试验的随机对照试验.

David Petroff1, Miroslav Bacak1, Nikolaos Dagres2

  • 1Clinical Trial Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Germany.

Contemporary clinical trials communications
|December 17, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

在随机对照试验中评估失明的质量至关重要. 这项研究引入了一种新的方法和R包,以克服现有的盲目评估工具的局限性,提高试验完整性.

关键词:
这是一个令人眼花乱的失明.这是一个令人眼花乱的指数.随机对照试验是随机对照试验.统计测试 统计测试威尔逊得分方法的得分方法

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

431
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

431
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.0K

科学领域:

  • 临床试验方法论 临床试验方法论
  • 研究中的统计分析.
  • 基于证据的医学基于证据的医学.

背景情况:

  • 失明是保持随机对照试验 (RCT) 完整性的关键组成部分.
  • 目前用于评估失明质量的方法,如詹姆斯指数和Bang指数,具有显著的局限性.
  • 由于缺乏强大的失明质量检查,这可能会损害试验结果的内部有效性.

研究的目的:

  • 在RCT中批判性地评估用于测量遮质量的现有指数.
  • 提出一种新的,更有利的方法来评估盲目的质量.
  • 为实施拟议的盲目评估方法提供实际工具.

主要方法:

  • 对于盲目评估的詹姆斯和Bang指数进行了批判性审查和概念分析.
  • 开发一种新的统计方法来量化临床试验中盲目的质量.
  • 创建一个R包,以方便计算拟议的盲目指数.

主要成果:

  • 詹姆斯和Bang指数在准确反映令人眼花乱的质量方面表现出相当大的弱点和局限性.
  • 拟议的替代方法提供了一种更可靠,更有利的方法来测量失明.
  • 一个R-包是可用的,用于实际应用新的盲目指数.

结论:

  • 在RCT中评估失明的现有方法是不充分的.
  • 新提出的方法和附带的R-package提供了一个优秀的工具来评估遮质量.
  • 实施这种新方法可以提高随机对照试验的严谨性和可靠性.