Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.0K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.0K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

39.7K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.7K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

90.0K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.0K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

83
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
83

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Concept(s) of Health: Lifestyle at the Heart of Modern Health.

Erkenntnis·2026
Same author

Tracing truth through conceptual scaling.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Giving Generic Language Another Thought.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2025
Same author

Salient semantics.

Synthese·2024
Same author

The ambiguity of "true" in English, German, and Chinese.

Asian journal of philosophy·2024
Same author

Evaluative Deflation, Social Expectations, and the Zone of Moral Indifference.

Cognitive science·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

822

通用和量化概括:不对称效应和战略沟通者.

Kevin Reuter1, Eleonore Neufeld2, Guillermo Del Pinal3

  • 1University of Zurich, Institute of Philosophy, Zürichbergstraße 43, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland.

Cognition
|December 17, 2024
PubMed
概括

通用陈述和量化语言显示了广泛的不对称效应,这并不仅仅是通用语. 这种影响可能会加剧社会偏见,特别是在非合作性沟通中,演讲者可能会故意误导接收者.

关键词:
不对称效应的影响.一般的药物是一般的药物.语言理解 语言理解量化器 是一个量化器.刻板印象的形成

更多相关视频

Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
06:39

Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements

Published on: August 28, 2017

14.2K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

822
Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
06:39

Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements

Published on: August 28, 2017

14.2K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.7K

科学领域:

  • 语言学的语言学.
  • 认知科学 认知科学
  • 社会心理学 社会心理学

背景情况:

  • 一般陈述是具有独特语言特征的常见概括.
  • 以前的研究表明,通用陈述中的不对称性可能导致社会偏见.
  • 假设这种不对称性是唯一的仿制药被广泛接受.

研究的目的:

  • 测试非对称性效应是否是通用类的唯一效应,或者是对其他语句类型的概括.
  • 调查说话者如何选择与接受条件和接收者推断相关的概括句子.
  • 了解不对称效应可以加剧社会偏见的条件.

主要方法:

  • 在仿制药和量化陈述中实证调查不对称效应.
  • 实验设计,以评估基于接受条件与接受者推断的说话者选择.
  • 分析通信场景 (合作与非合作) 以观察利用不对称性的情况.

主要成果:

  • 在通用药物和量化陈述中发现了普遍的不对称效应的证据 ('大多数', '一些', '通常', '通常').
  • 合作场景中的演讲者选择了泛化句子,暗示的流行与实际流行相匹配.
  • 在不合作的场景中,演讲者利用不对称的效应来误导接收者.

结论:

  • 非对称效应不是通用药的特点,而是语言中的普遍现象.
  • 发言人对接收者的推断敏感度会影响在合作环境中选择句子.
  • 在非合作性沟通中利用不对称效应可以引入有偏见的信念.