通用和量化概括:不对称效应和战略沟通者
Kevin Reuter1, Eleonore Neufeld2, Guillermo Del Pinal3
1University of Zurich, Institute of Philosophy, Zürichbergstraße 43, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland.
Cognition
|December 17, 2024
概括
通用陈述和量化语言显示了广泛的不对称效应,这并不仅仅是通用语. 这种影响可能会加剧社会偏见,特别是在非合作性沟通中,演讲者可能会故意误导接收者.
科学领域:
- 语言学的语言学.
- 认知科学 认知科学
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
背景情况:
- 一般陈述是具有独特语言特征的常见概括.
- 以前的研究表明,通用陈述中的不对称性可能导致社会偏见.
- 假设这种不对称性是唯一的仿制药被广泛接受.
研究的目的:
- 测试非对称性效应是否是通用类的唯一效应,或者是对其他语句类型的概括.
- 调查说话者如何选择与接受条件和接收者推断相关的概括句子.
- 了解不对称效应可以加剧社会偏见的条件.
主要方法:
- 在仿制药和量化陈述中实证调查不对称效应.
- 实验设计,以评估基于接受条件与接受者推断的说话者选择.
- 分析通信场景 (合作与非合作) 以观察利用不对称性的情况.
主要成果:
- 在通用药物和量化陈述中发现了普遍的不对称效应的证据 ('大多数', '一些', '通常', '通常').
- 合作场景中的演讲者选择了泛化句子,暗示的流行与实际流行相匹配.
- 在不合作的场景中,演讲者利用不对称的效应来误导接收者.
结论:
- 非对称效应不是通用药的特点,而是语言中的普遍现象.
- 发言人对接收者的推断敏感度会影响在合作环境中选择句子.
- 在非合作性沟通中利用不对称效应可以引入有偏见的信念.
更多相关视频
06:39Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
Published on: August 28, 2017
14.2K
09:03Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
Published on: February 29, 2020
5.7K
相关概念视频
Framing Effects
7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K
Stereotype Content Model
14.0K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.0K
Social Proof
27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K
Relationship Formation
39.7K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.7K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.0K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.0K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
83
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
83
