Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

86
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
86
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Reply to Quillien: Intuitive preferences and interpretive humility in intentionality judgments.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Correction: The Open Anchoring Quest Dataset: Anchored Estimates from 96 Studies on Anchoring Effects.

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same author

Belief in belief: Even atheists in secular countries show intuitive preferences favoring religious belief.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

'So Help Me God'? Does oath swearing in courtroom scenarios impact trial outcomes?

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2023
Same author

Caricatured facial movements enhance perception of emotional facial expressions.

Perception·2022
Same author

The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity.

Nature human behaviour·2022
Same journal

Emergence of collective mental time travel pathways upon remembering consequential elections.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Teams perform worse when newcomers hold critical information than when original group members do.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Auditory perceptual maps in humans and mice share common structures and predict perceptual decisions in discrimination learning.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Cross-cultural evidence for positive control and mind-mindedness as buffers for parental distress.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Why sycophantic LLMs may imperil interactive norms between humans.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Early detection of distinct language development in infants of mothers with severe mental illness using fNIRS.

Communications psychology·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

634

对未来选择的偏见预期预测了连续的经济决策.

Didrika S van de Wouw1, Ryan T McKay1, Nicholas Furl2

  • 1Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.

Communications psychology
|December 18, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

人们在最佳停止问题中表现出决策偏见,由于悲观的未来预期,经常低估选择. 这项研究确定了在全信息情景中这种偏见背后的机制.

更多相关视频

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

634
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 决策科学科学 决策科学
  • 计算建模计算建模

背景情况:

  • 最佳的停止问题涉及连续的选择,没有回忆或预见.
  • 在这些场景中,人类的决策往往偏离最佳策略.
  • 以前的研究强调了顺序搜索和选择任务中的偏见.

研究的目的:

  • 识别驱动决策偏差的机制,在一个现实的全信息最佳停止问题.
  • 调查序列长度和回报方案对采样行为的影响.
  • 开发和测试解释观察到偏差的计算模型.

主要方法:

  • 使用计算建模来分析决策过程.
  • 参与者参与了一个现实的全信息最佳停止任务.
  • 对序列长度和回报方案进行了操纵,以观察对采样率的影响.

主要成果:

  • 参与者表现出不愿意在最佳情况下增加抽样率,导致低抽样偏差.
  • 关于未来选项的低最佳悲观预期被确定为一个关键因素.
  • 计算模型表明错误指定的先前分布有助于偏差.

结论:

  • 在全面信息问题上的人类决策偏见源于悲观的未来预期.
  • 了解这些偏见可以改善现实世界的顺序搜索策略.
  • 调查结果为优化在线平台的选项展示提供了洞察力.