Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

86
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
86
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

78
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
78
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

A bibliometric analysis of neuroimaging studies on cognitive control in autism spectrum disorder (2000-2025).

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

From categorization to quantification: Stage-dependent neural and behavioral mechanisms of facial emotion recognition.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Upfront design beats post hoc reliability fixes.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Revisiting the big five-academic performance association: a one-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling reanalysis of 84 studies.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Revisiting the relationship between the big five personality traits and flow using meta-analytic structural equation modeling: a methodological perspective on Buseyne et al. (2025).

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Who is responsible for self-AI or others-AI collaboration? The effect of power and task outcome in responsibility attribution.

Acta psychologica·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

634

时间间决策中的偏好反转.

Yan-Bang Zhou1, Kun Zhang1, Hong-Kun Zhai2

  • 1Institute of Teacher Education, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.

Frontiers in psychology
|December 19, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

任务格式显著影响时间间决策,影响对较小,较早 (SS) 和较大,较晚 (LL) 奖励的偏好,无论是收益还是损失. 在选择和竞价任务之间,认知负载有所不同.

关键词:
获取 获取 获取 获取时间间的选择.这是一个损失,损失损失.偏好逆转 偏好逆转响应模式 响应模式 响应模式

更多相关视频

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

634
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

科学领域:

  • 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 决策科学 决策科学 决策科学

背景情况:

  • 时间间决策涉及选择奖励或损失随着时间的推移.
  • 不对称的偏好逆转,即根据环境而改变选择,是关键现象.
  • 了解任务格式如何影响这些决策对于行为洞察至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 研究时间间选择中的不对称偏好反转.
  • 通过选择和投标任务,在收益和损失环境中比较决策.
  • 评估与不同任务格式相关的认知需求.

主要方法:

  • 选择任务与跨时间决策的投标任务的比较.
  • 在收益和损失场景中检查偏好.
  • 测量决策时间以推断认知负载.
  • 通过370名参与者的真实世界问卷验证.

主要成果:

  • 在收益环境中,选择任务倾向于更小,更早的 (SS) 奖励,而竞标任务倾向于更大,更晚的 (LL) 奖励.
  • 在损失环境中,选择任务倾向于LL选项,投标任务倾向于SS选项.
  • 招标任务始终显示出比选择任务更长的决策时间,这表明认知需求更高.

结论:

  • 任务格式极大地影响时间间偏好,导致偏好反转.
  • 在选择和竞价任务之间,认知需求显著不同.
  • 这些发现对行为决策策略和应用上下文有实际意义.