哨兵测试,分析西格玛指标和风险管理方法作为简化方法验证/验证过程的一部分
Claudio Ilardo1, Chèhine Lamarti2, Batricia Al Muhanna2
1INOVIE LABOSUD laboratory (Inovie member), Montpellier, France.
Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation
|December 19, 2024
概括
一个新的风险评估工具有效地识别了关键的危险.
科学领域:
- 临床化学 临床化学
- 实验室的质量保证工作.
- 分析方法验证 分析方法验证
背景情况:
- 验证和验证实验室分析方法对于质量保证至关重要.
- 识别"哨兵"测试,对于质量控制至关重要,可以是一个复杂的过程.
- 简化这种识别是有效实验室管理的关键.
研究的目的:
- 开发和评估一种风险分析和评估工具,用于识别哨兵测试.
- 在临床实验室环境中优化验证和验证过程.
主要方法:
- 对83种血清分析物进行罗氏科巴斯8000系统的评估.
- 应用故障模式和影响分析 (FMEA) 来确定分析风险等级.
- 根据西格玛指标,潜在损害和环境因素计算风险优先级号码 (RPN).
主要成果:
- 在Cobas C701/ISE中,54种方法中有17种具有高风险 ("A"),需要系统审查;37种具有低风险 ("B"),符合选择性验证的条件.
- 在Cobas E801上,29种方法中有10种具有高风险 ("A"),需要系统验证;19种具有低风险 ("B"),可以接受选择性验证.
结论:
- 开发的风险分析和评估模型有效地识别了哨兵测试.
- 该工具简化了验证和验证过程,为精益管理原则做出了贡献.
更多相关视频
09:30Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
Published on: March 17, 2023
3.3K
11:49Quantitative Proteomics Workflow using Multiple Reaction Monitoring Based Detection of Proteins from Human Brain Tissue
Published on: August 28, 2021
4.4K
相关概念视频
Data Validation
142
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:
142
Quality Assurance
115
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
115
Contaminants and Errors
85
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
85
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Significance Testing: Overview
3.3K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.3K
Statistical Analysis: Overview
6.1K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.1K
