评估中国青少年约会暴力中的受害者-事者重叠:潜伏的阶级分析
1The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Journal of interpersonal violence
|December 20, 2024
概括
青少年约会暴力显示了明显的受害者-事者重叠,受到犯罪和同行欺凌的影响. 更强大的邻居债券提供了防止这种重叠的保护.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 犯罪学 犯罪学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 在青少年约会暴力 (ADV) 中,受害者与事者重叠的研究不足,特别是在中国等发展中国家.
- 现有的研究缺乏对导致这种重叠的途径的全面了解.
- 来自社会学习,一般应变和社会结合理论的理论框架提供了潜在的解释.
研究的目的:
- 调查导致中国青少年约会暴力 (ADV) 受害者与事者重叠的途径.
- 检查社会学习,一般应变和社会结合理论在解释这种重叠方面的作用.
- 在ADV中识别受害者-事者重叠的调解机制和直接前体.
主要方法:
- 隐性类分析应用于中国32所高中1787名约会青少年的样本.
- 从城市和农村环境中的青少年收集了数据.
- 统计分析探讨了理论构造,调解机制和受害者与事者重叠之间的关系.
主要成果:
- 在ADV的控制,心理和身体形式中发现了明显的受害者-事者重叠,随着严重程度的增加而增加.
- 参与一般犯罪和约会暴力团体增加了受害者与事者重叠的可能性.
- 同龄人欺凌的受害者是直接的预测因素,而童年父母之间的暴力,同龄人欺凌和社区暴力是间接的预测因素.
结论:
- 邻居社会纽带显示,与家庭或学校纽带相比,对受害者和事者重叠的保护作用更强.
- Deviant同行网络,包括一般犯罪和ADV,作为受害者-事者重叠的关键调解机制.
- 了解这些途径对于开发针对青少年约会暴力的有针对性的干预措施至关重要.
相关概念视频
Conduct Disorder
25
Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
25
Bullying
8.4K
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
8.4K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.2K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.2K
Relationship Formation
39.7K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.7K
Two-Way ANOVA
2.6K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
2.6K
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K


