映射审查的元流行病学和报告特征:一个范围审查
Yanfei Li1, Elizabeth Ghogomu2, Hanan Khalil3
1Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, School of Basic Medical Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Journal of clinical epidemiology
|December 21, 2024
概括
这项研究评估了映射审查,发现作者在国际上合作,但报告需要改进. 加强方法和结果部分的报告对于这些审查至关重要.
科学领域:
- 圣经计量学和科学计量学
- 卫生科学研究 卫生科学研究
- 社会科学研究 社会科学研究
背景情况:
- 地图审查越来越多地用于合成研究景观.
- 了解它们的元流行病学和报告质量对于研究综合是必不可少的.
研究的目的:
- 调查映射审查的元流行病学和报告特征.
- 确定作者,合作和机构贡献的趋势.
主要方法:
- 进行了2022-2023年发布的映射审查的范围审查.
- 一个28项的检查清单评估了200个审查的随机样本的报告特征.
- 用描述性统计数据分析数据,包括中位数和四分位数间范围.
主要成果:
- 包括451个映射审查,美国和伦敦大学是主要贡献者.
- 通常报告的项目包括标题,作者和摘要;方法,结果和讨论项目均为89.5至164项研究.
- 只有不到20%的研究报告了利益相关者定义,协议偏差和更新计划等关键项目.
结论:
- 映射审查涉及国际作者,但显示有限的团队合作.
- 方法和结果的报告需要增强,以突出映射审查的独特贡献.
相关概念视频
Introduction to Epidemiology
644
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
644
Study Designs in Epidemiology
180
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
180
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
153
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
153
Causality in Epidemiology
291
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
291
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
83
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
83
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
143
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
143


