决策中的风险偏好:从结构层面的角度来看
Hwan-Ho Noh1, Hye Bin Rim2, Byung-Kwan Lee2
1Barun ICT Research Center, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Acta psychologica
|December 22, 2024
概括
建筑层次对风险决策产生重大影响. 抽象思维放大了选择中的框架效应,而详细思维减少了它们,影响了注意力和感知.
科学领域:
- 决策科学 决策科学 决策科学
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
背景情况:
- 框架效应通过改变选项的呈现方式来影响决策.
- 构造层次理论认为,抽象思维 (高级构造) 专注于目标,而具体思维 (低级构造) 专注于具体情况.
研究的目的:
- 调查构造层如何缓和风险选择框架对决策偏好的影响.
- 了解抽象与具体思维在易受框架效应的影响中的作用.
主要方法:
- 参与者评估了在收益和损失框架中呈现的风险选择.
- 结构层被操纵,以创造高层次 (抽象) 和低层次 (具体) 的思维条件.
主要成果:
- 在高层结构中观察到显著的框架效应,在收益与损失框架下对风险选择有明显的偏好.
- 框架效应在低级构造中大幅减少,参与者更多地关注概率.
- 对结果与过程的注意力分配在高层和低层构造条件之间有所不同.
结论:
- 结构层次是影响风险决策中的框架效应大小的关键因素.
- 抽象思维放大了框架效应,表明了潜在的偏见,而具体的思维减轻了它们.
- 这些发现对理解认知偏见和设计干预措施以提高决策质量有影响.
相关概念视频
Framing Effects
7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K
Decision Making
86
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
86
Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
153
Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
Primary Appraisal:...
153
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
51
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
51


