Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

832
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
832
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

795
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
795
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

762
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
762
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

6.6K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.6K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

537
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
537
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

2.6K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
2.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Teaching Medical Students to Reason like Skilled Physicians.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Deconstructing Expert Cognitive Skills and Knowledge.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Eculizumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Complicated with Thrombotic Microangiopathy.

Iranian journal of kidney diseases·2026
Same author

Remote Augmented Reality Versus Traditional Simulation for Team Leader Assessment in a Cardiac Arrest Scenario: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR medical education·2026
Same author

Longitudinal Kinetics of T Cells and NK Cells After Pediatric Liver Transplant.

Pediatric transplantation·2026
Same author

Intravenous Liposomal Amphotericin as an Adjunct to Fluconazole in Pediatric Patients With Central Nervous System Coccidioidomycosis: A Single-Center Case Series.

Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: May 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
05:04

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

816

探索医学学生和专家临床医生的临床决策差异.

Marcos Rojas1, Argenta Price2, Candice Jeehae Kim1,3

  • 1Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Advances in medical education and practice
|December 30, 2024
PubMed
概括

专家临床医生和医学学生在临床推理实践和决策方面有所不同. 识别这些差异可以改善医学教育和评估工具,以改善学生的临床推理发展.

关键词:
临床决策 临床决策临床问题解决能力.临床推理 临床推理临床推理实践中的临床推理.决策是做出决策的过程.

更多相关视频

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
09:52

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

17.1K
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
05:04

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

816
Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
09:52

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

17.1K
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.4K

科学领域:

  • 医学教育 医学教育
  • 认知科学 认知科学
  • 学习科学 学习科学

背景情况:

  • 在医疗教育中整合临床推理理论和实践仍然存在挑战.
  • 现有的临床推理理论模型往往在教学和评估中缺乏实际应用.
  • 这项研究通过比较学生和专家使用解决问题的框架进行临床推理来弥补这一差距.

研究的目的:

  • 为了比较医学学生和专家临床医生之间的临床推理实践和决策.
  • 为了确定这些群体之间的诊断过程中的特定差异.
  • 为改善临床推理指导提供一个框架.

主要方法:

  • 一个基于学习科学问题解决框架的问卷是为一个儿科传染病病例开发的.
  • 从10名专家临床医生和斯坦福大学74名医学学生 (2019-2023) 收集了数据.
  • 演性内容分析用于编码响应,并识别临床推理实践和决策中的模式.

主要成果:

  • 经验地开发了一个详细的临床推理框架,包括九种实践和二十九种决定.
  • 在四个实践中的十个关键决策中,观察到专家和学生之间的显著差异.
  • 这些实践包括差异诊断的制定,诊断计划的执行,数据的重新评估和解决方案的审查.

结论:

  • 在统一的问题解决框架内,医学学生和专家医生之间临床推理的细微差异被确定.
  • 了解这些差异可以为开发有针对性的教学材料和评估工具提供信息.
  • 这项研究有助于教育工作者培养医疗学员基本的临床推理技能.