一种基于论证理论的评估工具,用于评估与健康相关的主张中的错误信息
Sara Rubinelli1, Nicola Diviani1
1Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Patient education and counseling
|December 31, 2024
概括
这项研究使用论证理论来帮助人们评估健康信息,创造一种工具来识别和抵制健康错误信息,并提高公共卫生素养.
科学领域:
- 卫生沟通健康沟通
- 论证理论 论证理论
- 公共卫生识字 公共卫生识字
背景情况:
- 越来越多的健康错误信息的威胁.
- 需要加强公众在评估健康信息方面的能力.
研究的目的:
- 利用论证理论来打击健康错误信息.
- 提高公众在评估健康信息方面的能力.
主要方法:
- 对健康虚假信息中的说服力策略的系统分析.
- 将战术分类为争论类型.
- 开发关键问题,以评估论证的有效性.
- 创建基于流程图的评估工具.
主要成果:
- 评估工具指导用户通过关键问题.
- 工具解决了数据滥用,逻辑谬误和情绪操纵的问题.
- 提高用户识别和抵制误导性的健康声明的能力.
结论:
- 论证理论提供了一个抵消虚假信息的框架.
- 评估工具增强了认知性和知情决策.
- 关于研讨会,在线资源和课程整合的建议.
相关概念视频
Routes of Persuasion
63.8K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
63.8K
Confirmation Biases
5.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.4K
Cognitive Dissonance
32.5K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.5K
Deductive Reasoning
54.9K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
54.9K
False Memories
71
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
71
Critical Thinking I
3.2K
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career...
3.2K


