透过雾看:解决模两可的能力减少了不诚实
Michael Puntiroli1, Serhiy Kandul2, Valéry Bezençon1
1University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Personality & social psychology bulletin
|January 7, 2025
概括
模糊性可以掩盖不诚实. 提高人们理解不清楚任务的能力,可以减少不诚实行为,促进诚实.
科学领域:
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
背景情况:
- 模糊性可以通过掩盖问责来促进不诚实的行为.
- 宽容模两可,个人能力和道德行为之间的相互作用仍然未被充分探索.
研究的目的:
- 为了调查任务模两可,个人的能力去消除模两可,和不诚实的行为的流行之间的关系.
- 为了确定是否提高清晰化能力可以减轻在模两可的情况下不诚实.
主要方法:
- 实验设计涉及参与者承担一个模两可的任务.
- 衡量参与者在解决模两可和他们报告的不诚实行为方面的表现.
- 干预研究 (研究2a,2b,3) 涉及培训以提高清晰度技能.
主要成果:
- 在任务模两可和不诚实的行为之间观察到积极的相关性.
- 成功解决模两可的参与者表现出更少的不诚实 (研究1).
- 提高信息明确性的能力导致不诚实行为减少 (研究2a,2b,3).
结论:
- 通过减少任务模两可,可以减少不诚实.
- 提高个人解决模两可的能力是促进诚实的有效策略.
- 情境 (减少模两可) 和个人层面 (提高能力) 的干预都可以制不诚实的行为.
相关概念视频
Cognitive Dissonance
32.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.2K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.1K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.1K
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.2K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.2K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
62
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
62
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
18
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
18


