使用明尼苏达州多相人格库存-2基于XGBoost机器学习算法诊断疼痛欺骗:单盲随机受控试验
Hyewon Chung1, Kihwan Nam2, Subin Lee1
1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 03312, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
|January 8, 2025
概括
美国明尼苏达州多相人格库存-2 (MMPI-2) 的机器学习分析有效地检测出疼痛欺骗. 与传统方法相比,这种方法提供了更好的诊断准确性.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
- 机器学习 机器学习
背景情况:
- 评估疼痛欺骗是很困难的,因为它的主观性质.
- 疼痛欺骗是一种心理干预形式,个人假装疼痛.
- 需要客观的诊断工具来欺骗疼痛.
研究的目的:
- 用机器学习 (ML) 分析明尼苏达州多相人格清单-2 (MMPI-2) 尺度来评估疼痛欺骗的诊断价值.
- 将ML诊断性能与后勤回归进行比较.
- 为了确定疼痛欺骗诊断的准确性,精度,回忆和f1分数.
主要方法:
- 一个单盲,随机对照试验,有96名参与者被分配到欺骗 (D) 和非欺骗 (ND) 组.
- D组的参与者被教导假装疼痛.
- 应用了XGBoost ML算法来分析选择的MMPI-2尺度 (sMMPI-2).
主要成果:
- 后勤回归分析显示,对于疼痛或MMPI-2没有诊断价值.
- 对sMMPI-2尺度的ML分析实现了0.724.4的准确性.
- 在ML分析中,精度为0.692,回忆率为0.692,f1得分为0.692.
结论:
- 对MMPI-2数据的机器学习分析证明了对疼痛欺骗的诊断能力.
- 在诊断疼痛欺骗方面,ML优于传统的后勤回归.
- 考虑多个MMPI-2尺度和模式可以提高诊断准确度.
相关概念视频
Self-Report Tests of Personality
307
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
307
Blind Procedures
10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K


