协调中风后认知评估及其预后价值的潜在挑战:叙述性综述
1Department of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Medical University-Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria.
Journal of medicine and life
|January 9, 2025
概括
在中风后标准化认知评估对于识别患有中风后认知障碍 (PSCI) 风险的患者至关重要. 协调的标准可以提高研究的一致性,并预测患者的结果.
科学领域:
- 神经学 神经学
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
背景情况:
- 脑卒中正在从死亡的主要原因转变为具有重大社会影响的慢性疾病.
- 脑卒中后认知障碍 (PSCI) 很普遍,即使在身体恢复良好的患者中也是如此.
- 识别患有认知衰退高风险的个体对于有效的干预和改善生活质量至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 审查制定标准化标准的可行性,以选择用于中风后评估的认知仪器.
- 探索协调中风后认知评估程序的方法.
- 讨论认知评估在预测PSCI,功能依赖和生存方面的预后价值.
主要方法:
- 关于PSCI评估的当前科学和临床知识的叙述性审查.
- 讨论标准化认知评估标准的潜在方法.
- 分析定义认知障碍,选择认知领域和规范化数据的方法.
主要成果:
- 在中风患者的认知评估标准化标准是可行的和必要的.
- 协调的程序可以减少研究研究中的异质性.
- 认知评估对于识别PSCI,功能依赖和死亡风险具有预后价值.
结论:
- 实施对中风患者认知评估的协调标准至关重要.
- 标准化将使PSCI患病率的可靠确定和预测其发生或恶化.
- 这种方法将提高中风幸存者及其家人的生活质量.
关键词:
ACE-R,阿登布鲁克的认知检查经过修订;AUC,曲线下的面积;CI,置信区间;;信任区间;DSM-5,精神疾病诊断和统计手册,第五版;HR,危险比; HR,危险比;ICH,大脑内出血; 大脑内出血;IST,艾萨克斯设置了测试;MCI,轻微的认知障碍;轻微的认知障碍;MMSE,迷你心理状态考试;蒙特利尔认知评估;美国国立卫生研究院 (NIHSS) 的中风量表;现在净值,负预测值;OCS,牛津认知屏幕;或,赔率比; 或,赔率比;PPV,积极的预测值; PPV,积极的预测值;这是PSCI.PSCI,中风后的认知障碍;SD,标准偏差; SD,标准偏差;过渡性缺血性心脏病发作 (TIA),过渡性缺血性心脏病发作;VASCOG,血管行为和认知障碍;VCD,血管性认知障碍 血管性认知障碍认知评估是一种认知评估.统一的标准是协调的标准.mRS,修改的兰金级; mRS,修改的兰金级;预后 预后 预后一次性中风中风中风中风中风相关概念视频
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Decision Making: P-value Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Metacognition
Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
Introspection
Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...
Counterfactual Thinking
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...


