认可,公平和领导力对员工成果的影响:一个大规模的多组分析
1Headquarters, HJ Institute of Technology and Management, Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
PloS one
|January 9, 2025
概括
工作场所的因素,如认可和领导力显著影响员工的参与度和倦怠. 量身定制的战略对于优化各部门的工作满意度和组织效率至关重要.
科学领域:
- 组织行为 组织行为
- 人力资源管理 人力资源管理
背景情况:
- 员工参与度,倦怠度和工作满意度是组织行为的关键指标.
- 了解工作场所的决定因素对于有效的管理和政策至关重要.
- 之前的研究强调了影响员工成果的各种因素,但特定部门的细微差别需要进一步调查.
研究的目的:
- 调查工作场所因素 (认可,公平,领导,工作量) 对员工参与度,倦怠和工作满意度的影响.
- 分析这些因素对私营和公共部门的影响的差异.
- 为组织战略提供基于证据的建议.
主要方法:
- 使用部分最小平方结构方程建模 (PLS-SEM) 进行定量分析.
- 数据从一个大样本 (25,285名员工) 中收集.
- 多组分析 (MGA) 用于比较私营和公共部门的影响.
主要成果:
- 认可显著提高员工参与度;公平和参与显示积极但较小的影响.
- 变革型领导力提高了参与度,减少了倦怠;工作负载过重影响了两者.
- 技术颠覆的焦虑对工作满意度有负面影响;观察到领导力和工作负载影响的部门特异性差异.
结论:
- 认可,公平和领导力是积极员工成果的关键驱动力.
- 工作负载管理和解决技术焦虑对幸福至关重要.
- 组织策略必须根据特定部门的动态量身定制,特别是在领导和工作量方面.
相关概念视频
Social Loafing
34.6K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.6K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
In- and Out-Groups
38.8K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.8K
Social Proof
27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.0K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.0K


