对生物医学研究的同行评审者的利益冲突:范围审查审查
Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen1,2, Camilla Hansen Nejstgaard3,2, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson3,2
1Cochrane Denmark & Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense (CEBMO), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark ckorfitsen@health.sdu.dk.
BMJ evidence-based medicine
|January 9, 2025
概括
同行评审者之间的利益冲突很普遍,但它们对推和整体发生的影响仍然不明. 本范围审查将对生物医学同行评审中的利益冲突研究进行映射,以指导未来的政策和管理.
科学领域:
- 生物医学研究的研究.
- 学术传播学术交流
- 科学出版业的科学出版.
背景情况:
- 同行评审对于研究质量和编辑决策至关重要.
- 审稿人的利益冲突 (COI) 可以损害同行评审的完整性.
- 在同行评审中对COI的实证研究对于理解和减轻风险至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 系统地绘制和描述关于同行评审者在生物医学研究中的利益冲突的实证研究的范围和性质.
- 确定研究缺口,并为未来的研究和政策制定提供信息.
主要方法:
- 进行了全面的范围审查,搜索了多个数据库,包括MEDLINE,Embase和Google Scholar.
- 包括研究对期刊手稿,论文,论文,会议摘要,资助申请和临床指南中的同行评审者的COI.
- 根据研究领域和目标提取和组织数据,主要分析直接调查COI的研究.
主要成果:
- 包括71项研究,其中41项是初级分析,主要关注期刊手稿 (73%) 和在2005-2023年期间发表的研究.
- 在同行评审者中,COI的患病率差异很大 (3%-91%),在1%的案例中,COI被认为是评审下降的原因.
- 研究主要集中在政策和管理 (22 项研究) 和利益相关者的经验 (13 项研究),对COI对建议的影响进行了有限的调查 (1 项研究).
结论:
- 大多数关于同行评审者COI的研究集中在期刊手稿上,使用政策调查和问卷.
- COI对审查建议的实际影响及其确切的流行程度需要进一步调查.
- 调查结果可以为制定一致的政策和管理策略提供信息,以应对同行评审者COI.
相关概念视频
00:42Cross-reactivity
31.0K
Overview
31.0K
01:24Biodiversity and Human Values
13.0K
Human civilization relies on biodiversity in many ways. Sudden changes in species biodiversity result in environmental changes that can modify weather patterns and therefore human civilizations.
13.0K
04:49Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
01:22Bias
3.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.7K
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
119
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
119
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
151
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
151