度对环境臭氧和牛皮之间的相关性的影响:一项医院时间序列研究
Hao Liu1, Kexue Wang1, Lili Yang2
1Department of Disease Prevention and Control, Daping Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Changjiang Branch St, 10#, Yuzhong, Chongqing, 400042, China.
International journal of biometeorology
|January 9, 2025
概括
短期暴露于低度环境臭氧 (O3) 与较少的牛皮探访有关,特别是在较冷的季节,男性和老年人. 较高的臭氧水平对牛皮门诊访问没有显著影响.
科学领域:
- 环境健康 环境健康
- 皮肤病学 皮肤病学
背景情况:
- 环境中暴露于臭氧 (O3) 是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题.
- 短期暴露于臭氧对牛皮的具体影响仍然在很大程度上是未知的.
研究的目的:
- 调查短期臭氧暴露和牛皮门诊访问之间的关联.
- 确定影响这种关系的潜在修改因素.
主要方法:
- 一项基于医院的时间序列研究,利用来自中国重庆的23921名牛皮门诊患者的访问记录.
- 用近似波松回归的一般添加模型来分析臭氧暴露和牛皮访问.
- 进行了子组分析,以探索潜在的修饰因素.
主要成果:
- 在整体臭氧暴露和牛皮门诊访问之间没有发现显著的关联.
- 低度臭氧 (低于100μg/m3) 与牛皮病病例有负面关联,峰值下降 -2.05%,滞后03.03.
- 这种负面关联在较冷的季节,40岁及以上的个体以及男性中更为明显.
结论:
- 低度的环境臭氧,而不是高度,可能与减少牛皮门诊访问有关.
- 特定的人口群体 (男性,40岁以上) 和季节性因素 (较冷的季节) 似乎会改变这种效应.
相关概念视频
Odds Ratio
101
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
101
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-II: Pathophysiology
2.7K
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) pathophysiology is intricate and multifaceted, involving a complex interplay of physiological processes. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for effectively managing and treating COPD. Here is an in-depth look at the critical elements in the pathophysiology of COPD:
Chronic Inflammation
Chronic Inflammation
2.7K
Correlations
32.6K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
32.6K
Correlation and Causation
37.4K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
37.4K
Correlation
11.6K
In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
11.6K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
141
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
141


