面对面和视频教育:它们是否会影响护理中的压力损伤知识?
Demet İnangil1, Nilüfer Ertürk, Elif Lale Pakdil
1Demet İnangil, PhD, RN, is Associate Professor, Nursing Department, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. Nilüfer Ertürk, RN, and Elif Lale Pakdil, RN, are nurses in the Ostomy and Wound Care Department, Health Sciences University, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul. İlayda Türkoğlu, MSN, RN, is Research Assistant, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing, University of Health Sciences. Özgül Torun, RN, is a nurse in the Ostomy and Wound Care Department, Health Sciences University, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital. Ayşe Kabuk, PhD, RN, is Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak.
在压力损伤 (PI) 护理方面培训护士显著提高了知识. 基于视频的培训显示,与单独的面对面培训相比,PI知识的增加更大.
科学领域:
- 护理教育 护理教育
- 患者安全 患者安全
- 伤口护理 伤口护理
背景情况:
- 压力伤害 (PIs) 是医疗机构的一个重大问题.
- 有效的护理教育对于改善PI预防和管理至关重要.
- 评估不同培训模式的影响对于优化学习成果至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 评估压力损伤 (PI) 护理培训对护士知识和满意度的影响.
- 为了比较面对面与基于视频的PI护理培训方法的有效性.
主要方法:
- 一个准实验性的,一组前测试后测试设计被用在了105名护士身上.
- 护士接受了面对面的培训,随后进行了为期四周的视频培训.
- 在培训前和培训后进行了护士PI护理知识水平评估 (NKLAPIC).
主要成果:
- 平均NKLAPIC分数从预训练时的47.71增加到面对面训练后的68.5和视频训练后的72.38 (P < .001).
- 基于视频的培训比单独的面对面培训显著增加了知识 (P < .001).
- 两种训练类型的满意度得分都很高,以视频为基础的训练略有优势 (4.12对3.97,P>0.05).
结论:
- 面对面和视频培训模式都有效地提高了护士对压力伤害护理的知识.
- 基于视频的培训可能提供一种更具影响力的方法,以增加护理人员的PI知识.
- 建议采用各种格式的持续教育策略,以提高PI护理标准.
相关概念视频
Current Trends in Nursing II
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation
Current Trends in Nursing I
Methods of Documentation III: PIE


