相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

无监督的网络评估的神经心理功能的预测价值

Michelle Werrmann¹, Yesim Gür-Tok¹, Michael Eid²

¹Division of Experimental Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195, Berlin, Germany.

Scientific reports

|January 10, 2025

概括

在线神经心理查 (NOS) 可以帮助识别需要进一步评估记忆和注意力缺陷的个人. 虽然不能取代面对面的评估,但特定的在线测试模式表明需要全面测试.

科学领域:

神经心理学神经心理学
认知科学认知科学
数字健康数字健康

背景情况:

神经心理学评估可以识别认知缺陷,但需要大量的时间.
基于Web的工具为有效的查提供了潜在的解决方案.
在线评估必须平衡可访问性和诊断准确性.

研究的目的:

评估一个无监督的认知缺陷在线查工具的预测准确性.
确定在线查是否可以识别需要广泛的人身神经心理评估的个体.
为了比较查对记忆和注意力缺陷的有效性.

主要方法:

分析了来自213名寻求帮助的个人进行面对面评估的数据.
使用神经心理学在线查 (NOS) 进行自我报告和记忆测试.
采用后勤回归和计算灵敏度和特异性用于缺陷检测.

主要成果:

在线查 (NOS) 显示了很好的分类准确性 (灵敏度=0.75,特异性=0.80) 检测至少一个认知缺陷.
自由回忆和视觉短期记忆性能预测的缺陷.
对记忆缺陷 (灵敏度=0.78,特异性=0.78) 的查比注意力缺陷 (灵敏度=0.68,特异性=0.75) 更有效.

结论:

无监督的在线神经心理查不能取代全面的面对面评估.
具体的在线查结果可能表明需要进行详细评估.
基于网络的工具可以帮助优先考虑个人进行广泛的神经心理测试.

关键词:

注意力注意力注意力注意力记忆记忆记忆记忆记忆神经心理诊断诊断神经心理学的诊断.预测值是一个预测值.基于网络的评估评估.

更多相关视频

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

相关概念视频

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.