Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

1.3K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
1.3K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.6K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
1.6K
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting01:26

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

995
Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
995
Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group01:29

Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group

13.1K
Interpersonal communication focuses on the exchange of messages between two people.
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
13.1K
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I01:21

Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I

1.6K
An interdisciplinary team includes many healthcare professionals working together and utilizing their skills, knowledge, and expertise to provide holistic and quality patient care.
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
1.6K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis01:24

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis

1.5K
The nursing process provides a clinical decision-making framework for patients and families to establish and implement a personalized care plan. Since part of the nurse's duties is to teach patients, the steps of the nursing process are the most effective way to approach instruction. The nursing process and the teaching-learning process are inextricably linked.
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
1.5K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

A National Survey of Pharmacy Skills Laboratory Faculty Perceptions of Evaluation, Promotion, and Workload Policies.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
Same author

Prevalence of Student Pharmacists with Neurodivergent Conditions in a School of Pharmacy.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
Same author

Usage and positivity rates of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in a memory clinic.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

A Deimplementation Framework for Curricular Hoarding in Pharmacy Education.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence (AI) usage on advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning·2025
Same author

Assessing the Acceptability of the Minnesota Effective Medication Self-Management Toolkit Four-Step Approach in Low-Income Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

The Senior care pharmacist·2025
Same journal

Artificial intelligence in interprofessional education and collaborative practice: towards a research agenda.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
Same journal

Validity and reliability of the modified Attitudes Toward Health Care Teams Scale translated into the native languages of four countries.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of interprofessional implementation approaches in dementia care for patients and caregivers.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
Same journal

Interprofessional education in pharmacology: students' attitudes and perceptions across pharmacy, nursing, and medicine.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
Same journal

Translation and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Interprofessional Education Academic Behavioral Confidence Scale (IPE-ABC).

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
Same journal

Transformation of an interprofessional learning strategy through organizational change principles and patient partnership.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 2, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.4K

在实践环境中比较四种评估专业间学习的方法.

Danah Alsane1, Kelly S Lockeman2, Darcy P Mays3

  • 1Department of Pharmacy Practice, Health Sciences Center, College of Pharmacy, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait.

Journal of interprofessional care
|January 16, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

评估跨专业团队工作的有效性需要多种措施,因为不同的视角 (学生,患者,观察者,教师) 捕捉不同的方面. 在动态的医疗保健环境中,各种因素影响了团队的表现.

关键词:
动态的团队 动态的团队专业间的协作 专业间的协作评估团队的评估团队.团队的有效性 团队的有效性

更多相关视频

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

18.9K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.4K
Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

18.9K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.2K

科学领域:

  • 医疗保健教育 医疗保健教育
  • 专业间合作 专业间合作
  • 团队工作评估 团队工作评估

背景情况:

  • 医疗保健团队需要不同专业人员之间的有效协作.
  • 在动态的,以学习者为基础的环境中评估专业间的团队合作存在重大挑战.
  • 每天团队组成的变化使得一致的评估变得复杂.

研究的目的:

  • 评估学生团队在动态实践环境中的跨专业团队协作效率.
  • 检查团队有效性的多个评估视角之间的关系.
  • 确定影响团队有效性评级的预测因素.

主要方法:

  • 使用了四种不同的衡量标准:学生的看法,患者的评分,观察者的评分和教师的评估.
  • 采样了100个患者访问,涉及社区健康计划的跨专业学生团队.
  • 采用双变量相关性和回归分析来分析数据.

主要成果:

  • 在教师/观察员和教师/患者评级之间发现了小而显著的负相关性.
  • 在患者/观察者评级之间观察到一个小而显著的正相关性.
  • 通过测量变量 (R平方53.6%和41.7%) 来预测教师和患者的评级更为强烈.
  • 患者年龄,病历,团队规模和诊所地点都影响了团队的有效性评级.

结论:

  • 不同的视角衡量不同的团队效率结构.
  • 为了全面了解跨专业教育 (IPE) 环境中的团队表现,多种措施是必不可少的.
  • 简单的测量方法可能会在复杂的医疗环境中不准确地代表学习和临床结果.