Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

141
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
141
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

27.6K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
27.6K
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

126
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
126
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

1.9K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
1.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Longitudinal MRI reveals adolescent pituitary growth patterns linked to puberty and environmental exposures.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Commonality and variability in functional networks in children under 5 years old.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Racialized Heteroscedasticity in Neuroimaging Features, Behavior Measures, and Neuroimaging-Based Predictive Models.

Research square·2026
Same author

Efficient Deep Learning Models for Predicting Individualized Task Activation From Resting-State Functional Connectivity.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

Patterns of brain-wide associations reflect socioeconomics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Refining RDoC Using Individual-Level Task fMRI Factor Models Reveals Reproducible and Clinically Relevant Brain-Wide Motifs.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 1, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.8K

一种数据驱动的潜在变量方法来验证研究领域的标准框架.

S K L Quah1, B Jo2, C Geniesse3

  • 1Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. shaunq@stanford.edu.

Nature communications
|January 18, 2025
PubMed
概括

研究领域标准 (RDoC) 框架可能需要修订. 一个新的双因素模型更好地反映了大脑电路,这表明了精神病学和神经科学研究的改进.

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

682
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.8K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

682
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

科学领域:

  • 神经科学是一个神经科学.
  • 精神病学是一个精神病学.
  • 认知科学 认知科学

背景情况:

  • 研究领域标准 (RDoC) 框架在神经科学和精神病学中广泛使用.
  • 有关RDoC框架与大脑电路相关的具体性和广度存在担忧.

研究的目的:

  • 通过开发更准确的脑电路模型来解决RDoC框架的局限性.
  • 建议基于功能神经成像数据对RDoC框架进行数据驱动的修订.

主要方法:

  • 利用潜变量方法,对来自6192名参与者的84个基于任务的fMRI (tfMRI) 激活图进行双因素分析.
  • 员工内部验证使用培训/举行集和外部验证使用Neurosynth元分析数据.
  • 对比了与现有的RDoC框架相对应的新型双因素模型的适应性.

主要成果:

  • 一个双因素模型,包括一个任务通用领域和一个分裂的认知系统领域,与RDoC框架相比,证明了对tfMRI数据的优越适应.
  • 兴奋和监管系统领域被认为在当前的RDoC结构中代表性不足.
  • 这些发现为完善RDoC框架提供了经验支持.

结论:

  • 当前的RDoC框架可能无法最佳地捕捉底层的大脑电路.
  • 一个经过修订的RDoC框架,由神经成像数据和双因素建模提供信息,可以提高精神病学和神经科学研究的特异性和准确性.
  • 未来的研究应该专注于基于数据的验证和RDoC框架的完善.