关于道德判断的资源理性虚拟讨价还价:走向一种概率主义认知模型
Diego Trujillo1,2, Mindy Zhang2, Tan Zhi-Xuan2
1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School.
Topics in cognitive science
|January 19, 2025
概括
道德心理学使用理想谈判的资源理性近似方法. 人们在高风险的情况下灵活地转向资源密集的讨价还价,表现出适应性决策.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 道德心理学道德心理学
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
背景情况:
- 资源理性合同主义理论认为,由于资源有限,道德决策涉及理想谈判的近似.
- 道德心理学可能采用各种机制,平衡准确性与资源需求.
研究的目的:
- 实证地测试这一说法,即更高的风险会触发更资源密集的决策过程.
- 在不同的资源限制下,研究道德决策的认知模型.
主要方法:
- 参与者通过虚拟讨价还价 (资源密集型) 或标准规则 (不那么密集型) 评估了场景.
- 分析了行为数据,以确定不同利益关的决策策略.
- 开发了一个认知模型来评估资源理性假设.
主要成果:
- 大约三分之一的参与者灵活地采用了资源合理化策略,在高风险情况下使用虚拟谈判,在低风险情况下使用规则.
- 三分之一的人始终使用基于规则的方法,而另外三分之一的人始终使用虚拟谈判.
- 支持反向假设 (低风险资源密集型) 的模型不符合观察到的数据.
结论:
- 经验证据支持资源理性合同主义模型,在道德决策中展示了适应性认知策略.
- 人类道德心理学灵活地分配认知资源,在高风险的场景中优先考虑准确性.
- 存在个人差异,一些参与者始终倾向于基于规则或讨价还价的方法.
相关概念视频
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Reason and Intuition
6.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.3K
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy
42
Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are grounded in the belief that our thoughts profoundly influence our emotions and actions. Advocates of CBT emphasize three core assumptions: first, that cognitions are identifiable and measurable; second, that they are central to psychological functioning; and third, that irrational or maladaptive beliefs can be replaced with rational and adaptive ones. This transformative approach to therapy has paved the way for specific models such as Albert...
42
The Availability Heuristic
5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K


