Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

137
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
137
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

280
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
280
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

195
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
195
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

82
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
82
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

8.2K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
8.2K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Synthetic control methods enable stronger causal inference using participatory science data in cities.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Direct and indirect effects of disturbance on net primary production in giant kelp forests.

Ecology·2026
Same author

Best practices for moving from correlation to causation in ecological research.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Riparian vegetation reduces coastal turbidity.

Communications sustainability·2026
Same author

Predicting missing links in food webs using stacked models and species traits.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A Causal Inference Framework for Climate Change Attribution in Ecology.

Ecology letters·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 1, 2025

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

7.8K

用观测数据和未观察到的混变量进行因果推理.

Jarrett E K Byrnes1, Laura E Dee2

  • 1Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Ecology letters
|January 21, 2025
PubMed
概括

生态学家可以通过与实验一起使用观测数据来改善因果推断. 新的方法有助于解决混变量,减少生态研究中的偏见.

科学领域:

  • 生态生态学 生态生态学
  • 因果推理因果推理
  • 统计建模 统计建模

背景情况:

  • 随机控制实验是生态因果推理的传统标准,但在更大的规模上往往是不可行的.
  • 由于混变量和遗漏变量偏差,观测数据对生态学中的因果推理提出了挑战.
  • 当前的生态方法可能会产生偏差的结果,当混没有得到充分的解决.

研究的目的:

  • 为了证明生态学家如何利用观测数据进行强有力的因果推断.
  • 在生态研究中引入减轻遗漏变量偏差的方法.
  • 提高从生态数据中得出的因果结论的可靠性.

主要方法:

  • 使用因果图来识别潜在的混变量.
  • 实施嵌套采样和先进的统计设计,以控制混因素.
  • 将传统的生态模型与替代因果推理技术进行比较.

主要成果:

  • 标准的生态方法 (例如混合模型) 可能由于遗漏的变量偏差而产生不正确的推断.
  • 替代因果推理方法有效地减少或消除遗漏的变量偏差.
  • 提出的方法提高了基于观测数据的因果估计的准确性.
关键词:
有关因果推理的推理.有关因果关系的因果关系相关的随机效应相关的随机效应.它们的内源性 (endogeneity).混合模型混合模型观察数据 观察数据 观察数据忽略了变量偏差的遗漏.面板回归的回归方法结构因果模型是结构因果模型.

更多相关视频

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.1K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2025

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

7.8K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.1K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K

结论:

  • 生态学家应该采用严格的因果推断方法来对观察数据进行推断,以克服实验的局限性.
  • 因果图,嵌套采样和特定的统计设计是减少偏差的宝贵工具.
  • 扩大因果推理工具包对于在规模上推进生态理解至关重要.