Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

643
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
643
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Biodiversity and Human Values01:24

Biodiversity and Human Values

13.0K
Human civilization relies on biodiversity in many ways. Sudden changes in species biodiversity result in environmental changes that can modify weather patterns and therefore human civilizations.
13.0K
Ethical Standards I01:25

Ethical Standards I

773
The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
773
Threats to Biodiversity01:50

Threats to Biodiversity

22.1K
There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...
22.1K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

53.6K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
53.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Impact of the Sources of Strength Peer Leader Program on Suicide Attempt Rates in 40 High Schools: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

School mental health·2026
Same author

The Role of Data in Public Health and Health Innovation: Perspectives on Social Determinants of Health, Community-Based Data Approaches, and AI.

Journal of medical Internet research·2025
Same author

Global Prevalence of Long COVID, Its Subtypes, and Risk Factors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Open forum infectious diseases·2025
Same author

Narrative Proceedings of the Inaugural Health Systems Implementing Climate Action Conference 2024.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2025
Same author

Evaluation of a Region-Wide Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program : A Pilot Cohort Study.

Annals of internal medicine·2025
Same author

THRIVE: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Social Validity of a Brief Recovery-Focused Intervention in Crisis Stabilization Centers.

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: May 31, 2025

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.1K

作者回复:关于"保护学术数据共享伙伴关系中的用户隐私和权利:危机时试点计划的原则"的评论

Anthony R Pisani1,2, Carlos Gallo3, Madelyn S Gould4,5

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Center for the Study and Prevention of Suicide, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.

Journal of medical Internet research
|January 22, 2025
PubMed
概括

这项研究重申了与研究人员分享危机文本行数据的伦理准则,强调机构审查委员会 (IRB) 监督和透明的做法,以保护数字健康研究中的弱势群体.

关键词:
合作行为 合作行为分享数据的数据共享.数字数据 数字数据 数字数据 数字数据伦理学 伦理 伦理学技术技术的技术技术的技术.短信 短信 短信 短信 短信 短信

更多相关视频

Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository
07:50

Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository

Published on: May 29, 2017

6.5K
Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

976

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 31, 2025

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.1K
Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository
07:50

Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository

Published on: May 29, 2017

6.5K
Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

976

科学领域:

  • 数字健康研究 数字健康研究
  • 数据伦理数据伦理
  • 公共卫生 公共卫生

背景情况:

  • 该评论质疑了2016-2017年危机文本线和学术研究人员之间的数据共享试点中的伦理实践.
  • 关键问题包括知情同意,利益冲突以及在数字健康研究中保护弱势群体.

研究的目的:

  • 为解决有关数字时代健康研究伦理行为的评论.
  • 澄清在危机文本线数据共享试点中使用的伦理框架和实践.
  • 重申关于非商业数据使用的原始研究的完整性和价值.

主要方法:

  • 该回应侧重于研究目的的非商业数据共享的伦理考虑.
  • 它强调了机构审查委员会 (IRB) 审查和研究人员培训的作用.
  • 强调了合作和披露实践的透明度.

主要成果:

  • 作者坚持他们的数据共享准则在道德上是合理的,并与既定做法保持一致.
  • 他们声称,无偿的顾问角色不构成需要披露的利益冲突.
  • 该研究强调了IRB在保护弱势群体方面的关键作用.

结论:

  • 这篇论文有助于讨论数字健康研究中的伦理数据共享.
  • 持续透明的参与和优秀实践的完善至关重要.
  • 该研究为未来在道德数据共享伙伴关系方面的改进提供了基础.