奥克卢Sense:可靠性,影响因素和局限性
International journal of computerized dentistry
|January 28, 2025
概括
在静态阻塞评估中,OccluSense显示出相当可靠的可靠性,明显低于传统的接纸和片. 它的准确性在深度咬伤病例中特别差,限制了其目前的临床使用.
科学领域:
- 牙的闭塞 牙的闭塞 牙的闭塞
- 诊断技术评估 诊断技术评估
背景情况:
- 准确评估静态阻塞对于牙科修复至关重要.
- 传统的方法,如拼接纸和纸被广泛使用,但可能是繁的.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较数字OccluSense设备的可靠性与常规的关节膜进行静态阻塞评估.
- 确定OccluSense在评估静态封闭时的局限性和影响因素.
主要方法:
- 实验研究使用20个具有不同闭合差异的环氧树脂型突模型.
- 静态阻塞在最大间位置评估使用shimstock作为黄金标准.
- 与40微米的关节纸 (AP) 和12微米的关节 (AF) 相比,OccluSense封闭图;使用科恩的卡帕系数 (κ) 评估内置器可靠性.
主要成果:
- 接纸 (AP) 和片 (AF) 显示出高可靠性 (分别为0.94和0.93),表明与黄金标准几乎完全一致.
- 在OccluSense的总体可靠性中,只有相当的可靠性 (κ=0.22).
- 可靠性在各个缺陷中有显著差异,深度咬伤显示了最低的一致性 (κ=0.02,P<0.05).
结论:
- 与传统的关节纸和相比,OccluSense对静态封闭评估的可靠性较低.
- 该设备的局限性在深度咬伤的情况下尤为明显.
- 目前OccluSense不适合作为一个独立的工具来进行静态闭塞评估.
相关概念视频
Naturalistic Observations
15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
81
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
81
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
135
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
135
Associative Learning
285
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
Classical conditioning, also known...
285


