科学出版物的撤回中令人震惊和轻蔑的事件:一个试点研究
Jyotindu Debnath1, Debjyoti Debnath2, Seema Patrikar3
1MG (Med), HQ, Uttar Bharat Area, Bareilly, India.
Medical journal, Armed Forces India
|January 28, 2025
概括
许多科学撤回通知缺乏完整性和清晰性,图像抄袭是一个重要的问题,通常是模糊地报道. 这一分析强调了在科学出版物中需要更加透明和详细的撤回报告的需要.
科学领域:
- 图书统计学 图书统计学
- 科学出版伦理学 出版伦理学
背景情况:
- 越来越多的科学撤回被发表.
- 人们对撤回通知的完整性和有用性存在担忧.
研究的目的:
- 为了分析PubMed发表的撤回通知的关键特征.
- 评估科学撤回的完整性和理由.
主要方法:
- 分析了2023年1月PubMed发布的295份撤回通知.
- 收集的数据包括期刊,出版商,作者归属,撤回原因以及通知的完整性.
主要成果:
- 只有31%的撤回通知提供了完整的细节.
- 受损的同行评审 (37%) 和抄袭 (20%) 是撤回的主要原因.
- 图像抄袭占所有抄袭案件的84%,通常是间接描述的.
- 编辑发起了88%的撤回,只有25%的案例是作者与编辑达成协议的.
结论:
- 很大一部分撤回通知是不完整的,模糊的或轻描淡写的.
- 数字和图像的盗版是科学出版业的一个新兴和严重的威胁.
相关概念视频
Negative Regulator Molecules
Positive regulators allow a cell to advance through cell cycle checkpoints. Negative regulators have an equally important role as they terminate a cell’s progression through the cell cycle—or pause it—until the cell meets specific criteria.
Viral Recombination
Cells are sometimes infected by more than one virus at once. When two viruses disassemble to expose their genomes for replication in the same cell, similar regions of their genomes can pair together and exchange sequences in a process called recombination. Alternatively, viruses with segmented genomes can swap segments in a process called reassortment.
Cross-reactivity
Overview
Ethics in Research
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Self-Discrepancy Theory
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...


