Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

114
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
114

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

An Investigation into the Low Use Rate of Immediate Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgeries in the U.S.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same author

Characterizing Research Impact in Ophthalmology: A Scoping Review.

Current eye research·2026
Same author

Public health and criminal justice funding for firearm injury prevention research in the United States.

Injury epidemiology·2026
Same author

Ocular and orbital injuries associated with fishing in United States emergency departments: 2014 to 2023.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2025
Same author

Characteristics of immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2025
Same author

Benefit-Risk Reporting for FDA-Cleared Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices.

JAMA health forum·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: May 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery
05:19

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery

Published on: December 1, 2023

909

白内障手术风险分层模型:系统审查

Chaerim Kang1, Angela S Zhu1, Olivia Waldman2

  • 1Division of Ophthalmology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Coro Center West, 1 Hoppin St, Suite 200, Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, USA.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
|February 3, 2025
PubMed
概括

白内障手术的风险分层模型有助于外科医生,但目前的版本有局限性. 为了更好的临床决策和患者结果,需要改进方法和验证.

关键词:
白内障手术是什么?白内障手术是什么?风险评分 风险评分风险分层是指风险的分层.手术的结果 手术的结果

更多相关视频

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery
05:19

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery

Published on: December 1, 2023

909
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K

科学领域:

  • 眼科医生 眼科 眼科
  • 手术风险评估手术风险评估
  • 临床决策支持 临床决策支持

背景情况:

  • 风险分层模型有助于白内障外科医生预测手术并发症.
  • 根据并发症可能性对患者进行分类有助于临床决策.

研究的目的:

  • 系统地审查和评估现有的白内障手术风险分层模型的特征.
  • 确定这些模型的常见预测因素和方法限制.

主要方法:

  • 系统审查遵循系统审查和元分析 (PRISMA) 准则的首选报告项目.
  • 在2024年1月搜索了六个数据库 (PubMed,OVID,Embase,CINAHL,Cochrane试验,科学网).
  • 包括对白内障手术并发症的术前风险模型的同行评审,全文,英语研究.

主要成果:

  • 在4192篇文章中,有8项研究符合纳入标准.
  • 模型主要针对临床外科医生进行化,预测区域性问题和后囊破裂.
  • 常见的危险因素包括患者的位置不佳,晚年,小瞳孔和伪皮综合征.

结论:

  • 白内障外科医生必须认识到当前风险分层模型的局限性.
  • 改进需要更强大的方法,标准化的结果测量和外部验证.
  • 改进的模型将加强手术前风险评估和手术规划.